Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (40)
- Part of a Book (11)
- Book (3)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Report (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (59) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (59)
Keywords
- Ecological restoration (3)
- Hay transfer (3)
- Monitoring (3)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Carbon sequestration (2)
- Danube (2)
- Moss (2)
- Secondary succession (2)
- Seeding (2)
- Species composition (2)
Institute
- Fakultät AuL (59)
Wasser- und Ufervegetation
(2016)
Im Rahmen des durch die EU geförderten LIFE-Projekts „Lippeaue“ wurden
künstliche Binnendünen angelegt, die Standorte für an Trockenheit und Nährstoffarmut angepasste Pflanzenarten bieten können. Im Jahr 2012 wurde eine Erfolgskontrolle der Vegetationsentwicklung auf den in den Jahren 2008 und 2009 neu geschaffenen Binnendünen durchgeführt.
Die meisten der neu angelegten Dünen in der Lippeaue bei Hamm waren im Jahr 2012 durch Grünlandvegetation auf sandigen und schluffigen Böden gekennzeichnet. Die Gesamtstickstoff-, Humus- und Wassergehalte des Bodens lagen an der oberen Grenze des Bereiches, der für Magerrasenentwicklung günstig ist. Da sich keine Magerrasenbestände in der Nähe befinden, ist eine Etablierung von Magerrasen ohne die gezielte Übertragung von Mahd- oder Rechgut nicht zu erreichen. Die im LIFE-Projekt angelegten Dünen sind daher nur bedingt in einzelnen Fällen für die Magerrasenentwicklung geeignet.
Die ökologische Wertigkeit von Binnendünen ergibt sich aus ihrer Eigenschaft als vegetationsökologisch bedeutsamer Sonderstandort innerhalb des durch Feuchtigkeit geprägten ökosystemaren Wirkungsgefüges der Aue. Wo sich Weidengebüsche auf den Dünen ausbreiten, müssen die Ziele der Auwaldentwicklung durch Sukzession und der Entwicklung von Magerrasen auch durch stärkere Beweidung gegeneinander abgewogen werden.
Green roofs are known to mitigate the negative effects of urban consolidation by offering diverse ecosystem functions compared to non-vegetated roofs. However, the support for native biodiversity might be improved by using native plant species. In a mesocosm experiment, we studied the suitability of three commercial green-roof growth substrates for the establishment of 27 native plant species from dry sandy grasslands of northwestern Germany over the course of four years. The substrates were mineral-based, but differed in the layering of organic matter. Total establishment rates reached 44–59% in Year 4, indicating the general suitability of the substrates. During the first weeks after seeding, with light irrigation, the vascular plant cover was greater in the similar substrates Zincolit® Plus (Z) and Zincolit® Plus-Leicht (ZL) with their compost-based organic mulch layers than in the substrate Sedumteppich (ST) with its organic matter evenly admixed with the mineral aggregates. In Years 2 and 3, however, the vascular plant cover was greater in the ST substrate, likely due to the better availability of water and nutrients from the organic matter compared to the dry surface-mulch layer variants Z and ZL. After severe drought events, the decline in plant cover was more pronounced in the ST substrate, likely representing a trade-off between lush growth and a susceptibility to drought. An indicator-species analysis revealed differences in species composition between the ST and Z/ZL substrates. Annual plant species were indicators of the ST substrate. Perennials, such as Thymus pulegioides and Achillea millefolium, were typical of the Z and ZL substrates. In addition to the general suitability of the tested standard substrates for target species establishment, the study indicated that a combination of different layers of substrate components resulted in different vegetation patterns that may have a positive effect on green-roof biodiversity.
During recent decades, many studies have shown that the successful restoration of species-rich grasslands is often seed-limited because of depleted seed banks and limited seed dispersal in modern fragmented landscapes. In Europe, commercial seed mixtures, which are widely used for restoration measures, mostly consist of species and varieties of non-local provenance. The regional biodiversity of a given landscape, however, can be preserved only when seeds or plants of local provenance are used in restoration projects. Furthermore, the transfer of suitable target species of local provenance can strongly enhance restoration success.
We review and evaluate the success of currently used near-natural methods for the introduction of target plant species (e.g. seeding of site-specific seed mixtures, transfer of fresh seed-containing hay, vacuum harvesting, transfer of turves or seed-containing soil) on restoration sites, ranging from dry and mesic meadows to floodplain grasslands and fens. Own data combined with literature findings show species establishment rates during the initial phase as well as the persistence of target species during long-term vegetation development on restoration sites.
In conclusion, our review indicates that seed limitation can be overcome successfully by most of the reviewed measures for species introduction. The establishment of species-rich grasslands is most successful when seeds, seed-containing plant material or soil are spread on bare soil of ex-arable fields after tilling or topsoil removal, or on raw soils, e.g. in mined areas. In species-poor grasslands without soil disturbance and on older ex-arable fields with dense weed vegetation, final transfer rates were the lowest. For future restoration projects, suitable measures have to be chosen carefully from case to case as they differ considerably in costs and logistic effort. Long-term prospects for restored grassland are especially good when management can be incorporated in agricultural systems.