Article
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (16) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (16) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (16)
Keywords
- Alar ligaments (1)
- Hyperalgesie (1)
- Kiefergelenk (1)
- Kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktion (1)
- Physiotherapie (1)
- Stenose (1)
- Triggerpunkte (1)
- Zentrale Sensibilisierung (1)
- clinical tests (1)
- lumbal (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (16) (remove)
Atopic dermatitis, STAT3- and DOCK8-hyper-IgE syndromes differ in IgE-based sensitization pattern
(2014)
Introduction
Tests to evaluate the integrity of the alar ligaments are important clinical tools for manual therapists, but there is limited research regarding their validity.
Method
A single blinded examiner assessed alar ligament integrity using the lateral shear test (LST), rotation stress test (RST) and side-bending stress test (SBST) on a sample of convenience comprising 7 subjects with MRI confirmed alar ligament lesions and 11 healthy people. Alar ligament lesions were identified using both supine and high-field strength upright MRI.
Results
The RST had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 69.2%. The SBST and the LST both showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 76.9%. In cases where all three tests were positive, the specificity increased to 84.6%.
Discussion
Tests of manual examination of alar ligament integrity have some diagnostic utility; however, these findings require further corroboration in a larger sample.
Zielsetzung
Bis dato konnte keine Studie eine Veränderung der Druckempfindlichkeit der myofaszialen Tender- oder Triggerpunkte (MTrP) bei Patienten mit kraniomandibulärer Dysfunktion (CMD) im extratrigeminalen Versorgungsgebiet nachweisen. Ziel dieser Studie war herauszufinden, ob die Druckempfindlichkeit der MTrP bei CMD-Patienten sowohl im trigeminalen als auch im extratrigeminalen Versorgungsgebiet im Vergleich zu gesunden Kontrollen erhöht ist. Außerdem sollte untersucht werden, inwieweit MTrP als Marker geeignet sind, eine Hyperalgesie bei CMD-Patienten zu diagnostizieren.
Probanden und Methoden
Für die Studie wurden 34 CMD-Patienten und 30 Probanden ohne CMD rekrutiert. In beiden Gruppen wurde die mechanische Schmerzschwelle an trigeminalen und extratrigeminalen MTrP gemessen und verglichen. Zusätzlich wurde mittels ROC-Kurve untersucht, welcher Marker am besten geeignet ist, CMD-Patienten als hyperalgetisch zu klassifizieren.
Ergebnis
Die Druckempfindlichkeit aller MTrP der trigeminalen und extratrigeminalen Körperregionen war in der CMD-Gruppe signifikant erhöht. Selbst nach Korrektur für multiples Testen blieben die meisten Effekte signifikant. Von den untersuchten MTrP war der M. trapezius am besten geeignet, CMD-Patienten als hyperalgetisch zu klassifizieren. Bei einer falsch-positiven Rate <5 % wurden ca. 42 % der CMD-Patienten als hyperalgetisch klassifiziert.
Schlussfolgerung
Die signifikanten Unterschiede der Druckempfindlichkeit der MTrP in trigeminalen und extratrigeminalen Körperregionen lassen auf eine Hyperalgesie bei CMD-Patienten schließen. Diese kann möglicherweise mit dem Marker des M. trapezius diagnostiziert werden. Hierzu sind jedoch weitere Studien notwendig, die u. a. geschlechts- und altersspezifische Referenzwerte ermitteln.
Objective
To identify assessment tools used to evaluate patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) considered to be clinically most useful by a panel of international experts in TMD physical therapy (PT).
Methods
A Delphi survey method administered to a panel of international experts in TMD PT was conducted over three rounds from October 2017 to June 2018. The initial contact was made by email. Participation was voluntary. An e-survey, according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES), was posted using SurveyMonkey for each round. Percentages of responses were analysed for each question from each round of the Delphi survey administrations.
Results
Twenty-three experts (completion rate: 23/25) completed all three rounds of the survey for three clinical test categories: 1) questionnaires, 2) pain screening tools and 3) physical examination tests. The following was the consensus-based decision regarding the identification of the clinically most useful assessments. (1) Four of 9 questionnaires were identified: Jaw Functional Limitation (JFL-8), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular disorders (TSK/TMD) and the neck disability index (NDI). (2) Three of 8 identified pain screening tests: visual analog scale (VAS), numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and pain during mandibular movements. (3) Eight of 18 identified physical examination tests: physiological temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements, trigger point (TrP) palpation of the masticatory muscles, TrP palpation away from the masticatory system, accessory movements, articular palpation, noise detection during movement, manual screening of the cervical spine and the Neck Flexor Muscle Endurance Test.
Conclusion
After three rounds in this Delphi survey, the results of the most used assessment tools by TMD PT experts were established. They proved to be founded on test construct, test psychometric properties (reliability/validity) and expert preference for test clusters. A concordance with the screening tools of the diagnostic criteria of TMD consortium was noted. Findings may be used to guide policymaking purposes and future diagnostic research.
AIM: In this prospective longitudinal study, the physical and psychological health status of music students is assessed at the beginning of their university music study and tracked over time. Analysis strategies and interim results from the first-year cohort, including 1-year incidences, monthly prevalences, and predictors of developing musculoskeletal health complaints (MHC), are presented.
METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study is calculated to enlist a total sample of 370 participants, including musicians and non-musicians, over 5 years. Baseline measurements include a self-designed questionnaire, core strength endurance, hypermobility, finger-floor-distance, motor control, mechanosensitivity, health-related quality of life (SF36), and stress and coping inventory (SCI). The occurrence of MHC is based on monthly online questionnaires.
RESULTS: The first-year subcohort enrolled 33 music students and 30 non-music control students. The mean monthly completion rate for the questionnaire was 55.7±8.7%. At baseline, music students showed significantly more stress symptoms, reduced physical function¬ing, and increased bodily pain compared to control students. The 1-year incidence of MHC was 59% for music students and 44% for controls. Risk factors for MHC included being a music student, previous pain, reduced physical functioning, stress symptoms, reduced emotional functioning, and mechanosensitivity. Being a music student, physical functioning, sleep duration, positive thinking, and general mechanosensitivity had a predictive ability of 0.77 (ROC curve) for MHC.
CONCLUSION: A total of 63 students enrolled in the first cohort is in line with the precalculated sample size. This prospective study design enables the measurement of MHC incidence and provides insight into mechanisms in the development of MHC among music students, including the interaction of physical, psychological, and psychosocial factors.