Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (32) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (21)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Other (1)
Language
- English (32) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (32) (remove)
Keywords
- Aesthetics (1)
- Birth (1)
- Cervical range of motion (1)
- Event-related potentials (1)
- Expertise (1)
- Flexion-rotation test (1)
- Human-computer interaction (1)
- Mandible position (1)
- Maternal well-being (1)
- Mother–infant bonding (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (32) (remove)
Research into positive aspects of the psyche is growing as psychologists learn more about the protective role of positive processes in the development and course of mental disorders, and about their substantial role in promoting mental health. With increasing globalization, there is strong interest in studies examining positive constructs across cultures. To obtain valid cross-cultural comparisons, measurement invariance for the scales assessing positive constructs has to be established. The current study aims to assess the cross-cultural measurement invariance of questionnaires for 6 positive constructs: Social Support (Fydrich, Sommer, Tydecks, & Brähler, 2009), Happiness (Subjective Happiness Scale; Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999), Life Satisfaction (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985), Positive Mental Health Scale (Lukat, Margraf, Lutz, van der Veld, & Becker, 2016), Optimism (revised Life Orientation Test [LOT-R]; Scheier, Carver, & Bridges, 1994) and Resilience (Schumacher, Leppert, Gunzelmann, Strauss, & Brähler, 2004). Participants included German (n = 4,453), Russian (n = 3,806), and Chinese (n = 12,524) university students. Confirmatory factor analyses and measurement invariance testing demonstrated at least partial strong measurement invariance for all scales except the LOT-R and Subjective Happiness Scale. The latent mean comparisons of the constructs indicated differences between national groups. Potential methodological and cultural explanations for the intergroup differences are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Climate change is expected to exacerbate the current threats to freshwater ecosystems, yet multifaceted studies on the
potential impacts of climate change on freshwater biodiversity at scales that inform management planning are lacking. The aim of this study was to fill this void through the development of a novel framework for assessing climate
change vulnerability tailored to freshwater ecosystems. The three dimensions of climate change vulnerability are as
follows: (i) exposure to climate change, (ii) sensitivity to altered environmental conditions and (iii) resilience potential.
Our vulnerability framework includes 1685 freshwater species of plants, fishes, molluscs, odonates, amphibians, crayfish and turtles alongside key features within and between catchments, such as topography and connectivity. Several
methodologies were used to combine these dimensions across a variety of future climate change models and scenarios. The resulting indices were overlaid to assess the vulnerability of European freshwater ecosystems at the catchment scale (18 783 catchments). The Balkan Lakes Ohrid and Prespa and Mediterranean islands emerge as most
vulnerable to climate change. For the 2030s, we showed a consensus among the applied methods whereby up to 573
lake and river catchments are highly vulnerable to climate change. The anthropogenic disruption of hydrological
habitat connectivity by dams is the major factor reducing climate change resilience. A gap analysis demonstrated that
the current European protected area network covers <25% of the most vulnerable catchments. Practical steps need to
be taken to ensure the persistence of freshwater biodiversity under climate change. Priority should be placed on
enhancing stakeholder cooperation at the major basin scale towards preventing further degradation of freshwater
ecosystems and maintaining connectivity among catchments. The catchments identified as most vulnerable to climate
change provide preliminary targets for development of climate change conservation management and mitigation
strategies.