610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (67) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (35)
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Book (5)
- Other (3)
- Bachelor Thesis (2)
Keywords
- Nutritional sustainability (2)
- Adhärenz (1)
- Alar ligaments (1)
- Arbeitspsychologie (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Bass model (1)
- Berufsausstieg (1)
- Cervical (1)
- Communication in agrifood chains (1)
- Complex food systems (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (62)
- Fakultät AuL (2)
- Institut für Duale Studiengänge (2)
- Fakultät MKT (1)
Current discussions about the concept of nutritional sustainability show a high complexity of this topic leading to many different definitions. Regarding communication issues of nutritional sustainability between actors of food chains this complexity should be reduced. One opportunity to tackle these challenges of reducing complexity might be the concept of ingredient branding. Therefore, the aim of this mini-review is the identification of conditions for ingredient branding application as a communication strategy for nutritional sustainability which might overcome challenges in communicating the complexity between the different stakeholders of supply chains. In doing so, the specific case of agrifood chains is discussed based on the selected characteristics of globalization, increasing consumer demands, foods incorporating credence attributes and price. Along the agrifood chain, a sourcing strategy reflecting nutritional and sustainable aspects might lead to an ingredient branding strategy implying a brand policy for a special ingredient within the final product which is an important component but cannot be clearly recognized by the user. A “nutritional sustainability inside” strategy should reflect the multifaceted information along the agrifood chain and should be based on standardized criteria for nutritional sustainability.
Integration of nutritional and sustainable aspects is a complex task tackled by a few scientific concepts. They include multiple dimensions and functions of food systems trying to provide solutions for harmonic co-evolution of humanity and planet Earth. “Nutritional Sustainability” is differentiated from other concepts which combine nutrition and sustainability as it not only sets environmental sustaining capacity as a baseline level for balanced nutrition, but also aims for the search of food system driving nodes. It does not aim for the support of solutions of producing enough or more food for increasing population (sustainable nutrition), neither does it contradict other similar concepts [sustainable nutrition security, nutritional life cycle assessment (LCA)]. However, it calls for more definite estimation of the carrying capacity of the environment on personal, local, and national levels for the development of more efficient solutions of nutrition balanced in the limits of environmental carrying capacity. The review is providing a few examples of advances in nutritional science (personalized nutrition, nutrigenetics), food technology (personalized food processing, food ecodesign), and food complex systems (artificial intelligence and gut microbiome), which have a great potential to progress sustainable food systems with Nutritional Sustainability set as a guiding concept.
Insbesondere in wissensintensiven Unternehmen wie dem Krankenhaus birgt die Umstellung auf digitale Prozesse ein großes Innovations- und Produktivitätspotenzial. Der Beitrag erörtert und bewertet die Digitalisierungsfrage aus der betrieblichen Sicht des Krankenhausmanagements hinsichtlich der Voraussetzungen und der aktuell als realistisch einzuschätzenden Potenziale für das Unternehmen. Ausgehend von einer Begriffsklärung der Digitalisierung wird der Zusammenhang zwischen Digitalisierung und Krankenhausorganisation betrachtet. Daran knüpfen Ausführungen zu organisatorischen, personellen und finanziellen Voraussetzungen eines digitalen Krankenhauses an. Bei der Darstellung der Potenziale wird zwischen innerbetrieblichen und unternehmens- bzw. institutionenübergreifenden Aspekten eines digitalen Krankenhauses unterschieden. Ein besonderes Augenmerk wird auf die Elektronische Patientenakte (EPA) gelegt, da sie für den medizinisch-pflegerischen Kernprozess im Krankenhaus besonders wertvoll ist. Am Beispiel der Materialwirtschaft/Logistik werden die digitalen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten in den Unterstützungsprozessen des Krankenhauses erläutert.
Background and aims
In 2008, the International Association for the Study of Pain Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) proposed a clinical grading system to help identify patients with neuropathic pain (NeP). We previously applied this classification system, along with two NeP screening tools, the painDETECT (PD-Q) and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale (LANSS), to identify NeP in patients with neck/upper limb pain. Both screening tools failed to identify a large proportion of patients with clinically classified NeP, however a limitation of our study was the use of a single clinician performing the NeP classification. In 2016, the NeuPSIG grading system was updated with the aim of improving its clinical utility. We were interested in field testing of the revised grading system, in particular in the application of the grading system and the agreement of interpretation of clinical findings. The primary aim of the current study was to explore the application of the NeuPSIG revised grading system based on patient records and to establish the inter-rater agreement of detecting NeP. A secondary aim was to investigate the level of agreement in detecting NeP between the revised NeuPSIG grading system and the LANSS and PD-Q.
Methods
In this retrospective study, two expert clinicians (Specialist Pain Medicine Physician and Advanced Scope Physiotherapist) independently reviewed 152 patient case notes and classified them according to the revised grading system. The consensus of the expert clinicians’ clinical classification was used as “gold standard” to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the two NeP screening tools.
Results
The two clinicians agreed in classifying 117 out of 152 patients (ICC 0.794, 95% CI 0.716–850; κ 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.73), yielding a 77% agreement. Compared to the clinicians’ consensus, both LANSS and PD-Q demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy in detecting NeP (LANSS sensitivity 24%, specificity 97%; PD-Q sensitivity 53%, specificity 67%).
Conclusions
The application of the revised NeP grading system was feasible in our retrospective analysis of patients with neck/upper limb pain. High inter-rater percentage agreement was demonstrated. The hierarchical order of classification may lead to false negative classification. We propose that in the absence of sensory changes or diagnostic tests in patients with neck/upper limb pain, classification of NeP may be further improved using a cluster of clinical findings that confirm a relevant nerve lesion/disease, such as reflex and motor changes. The diagnostic accuracy of LANSS and PD-Q in identifying NeP in patients with neck/upper limb pain remains limited. Clinical judgment remains crucial to diagnosing NeP in the clinical practice.
Implications
Our observations suggest that in view of the heterogeneity in patients with neck/upper limb pain, a considerable amount of expertise is required to interpret the revised grading system. While the application was feasible in our clinical setting, it is unclear if this will be feasible to apply in primary health care settings where early recognition and timely intervention is often most needed. The use of LANSS and PD-Q in the identification of NeP in patients with neck/upper limb pain remains questionable.
Introduction Development and implementation of appropriate health policy is essential to address the rising global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate existing health policies for integrated prevention/management of NCDs among Member States of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We sought to describe policies’ aims and strategies to achieve those aims, and evaluate extent of integration of musculoskeletal conditions as a leading cause of global morbidity.
Methods Policies submitted by OECD Member States in response to a World Health Organization (WHO) NCD Capacity Survey were extracted from the WHO document clearing-house and analysed following a standard protocol. Policies were eligible for inclusion when they described an integrated approach to prevention/management of NCDs. Internal validity was evaluated using a standard instrument (sum score: 0–14; higher scores indicate better quality). Quantitative data were expressed as frequencies, while text data were content-analysed and meta-synthesised using standardised methods.
Results After removal of duplicates and screening, 44 policies from 30 OECD Member States were included. Three key themes emerged to describe the general aims of included policies: system strengthening approaches; improved service delivery; and better population health. Whereas the policies of most countries covered cancer (83.3%), cardiovascular disease (76.6%), diabetes/endocrine disorders (76.6%), respiratory conditions (63.3%) and mental health conditions (63.3%), only half the countries included musculoskeletal health and pain (50.0%) as explicit foci. General strategies were outlined in 42 (95.5%) policies—all were relevant to musculoskeletal health in 12 policies, some relevant in 27 policies and none relevant in three policies. Three key themes described the strategies: general principles for people-centred NCD prevention/management; enhanced service delivery; and system strengthening approaches. Internal validity sum scores ranged from 0 to 13; mean: 7.6 (95% CI 6.5 to 8.7).
Conclusion Relative to other NCDs, musculoskeletal health did not feature as prominently, although many general prevention/management strategies were relevant to musculoskeletal health improvement.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.
Background
This study describes a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test (CST) battery and evaluates its concurrent validity as a screening tool to detect somatosensory dysfunction as determined using quantitative sensory testing (QST).
Method
Three patient cohorts with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS, n = 76), non-specific neck and arm pain (NSNAP, n = 40) and lumbar radicular pain/radiculopathy (LR, n = 26) were included. The CST consisted of 13 tests, each corresponding to a QST parameter and evaluating a broad spectrum of sensory functions using thermal (coins, ice cube, hot test tube) and mechanical (cotton wool, von Frey hairs, tuning fork, toothpicks, thumb and eraser pressure) detection and pain thresholds testing both loss and gain of function. Agreement rate, statistical significance and strength of correlation (phi coefficient) between CST and QST parameters were calculated.
Results
Several CST parameters (cold, warm and mechanical detection thresholds as well as cold and pressure pain thresholds) were significantly correlated with QST, with a majority demonstrating >60% agreement rates and moderate to relatively strong correlations. However, agreement varied among cohorts. Gain of function parameters showed stronger agreement in the CTS and LR cohorts, whereas loss of function parameters had better agreement in the NSNAP cohort. Other CST parameters (16 mN von Frey tests, vibration detection, heat and mechanical pain thresholds, wind-up ratio) did not significantly correlate with QST.
Conclusion
Some of the tests in the CST could help detect somatosensory dysfunction as determined with QST. Parts of the CST could therefore be used as a low-cost screening tool in a clinical setting.
Significance
Quantitative sensory testing, albeit considered the gold standard to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction, requires expensive equipment, specialized examiner training and substantial time commitment which challenges its use in a clinical setting. Our study describes a CST as a low-cost and time-efficient alternative. Some of the CST tools (cold, warm, mechanical detection thresholds; pressure pain thresholds) significantly correlated with the respective QST parameters, suggesting that they may be useful in a clinical setting to detect sensory dysfunction.
Hintergrund:
Wenn freiberufliche Hebammen die Geburtshilfe aufgeben hat dies in Bayern drastische Konsequenzen. Fast drei Viertel der bayerischen Kreißsäle arbeiten im Belegsystem, d.h. mit freiberuflichen Hebammen im Schichtdienst. Die wissenschaftliche Aufbereitung von Stress bei der Arbeit kann dazu beitragen, die Abwanderung freiberuflicher Hebammen aus der Geburtshilfe zu erklären.
Ziel:
Das Ziel war die Messung der Prävalenz von Gratifikationskrisen nach Siegrist als Prädiktor für zukünftige Berufsausstiege freiberuflicher Hebammen in Bayern.
Methodik:
Das Modell der Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) misst die Ratio aus beruflicher Verausgabung und dafür erhaltener Belohnung. Erhöhte ERI-Ratio Werte (≥1) weisen auf Gratifikationskrisen hin, welche als Prädiktor für Arbeitsstress und daraus resultierende Berufsausstiege gewertet werden können. Die Prävalenz solcher Gratifikationskrisen wurde in einer onlinebasierten Querschnittstudie an einer Stichprobe von 107 freiberuflichen Hebammen in Bayern gemessen.
Ergebnisse:
Die befragten Hebammen (N=45) hatten im Jahr 2013 im Median 50 Geburten betreut (SD 54,6) und hatten 10 Jahre Berufserfahrung (SD 9,7). Die Prävalenz von Gratifikationskrisen betrug in der Gesamtstichprobe 73% (n=33), im Median 1.2 (SD 0,3). Als belastend gaben die befragten Hebammen ihre finanzielle Entlohnung an und dass sie eine Verschlechterung ihrer beruflichen Situation erwarteten. Freiberufliche Hebammen im Kreisssaal-Schichtdienst gaben außerdem den Faktor „Zeitdruck“ als besonders belastend an. Als Belohnungsfaktor nannten die befragten Hebammen die Anerkennung von Kolleginnen und Kollegen und anderen beruflich wichtigen Personen.
Schlussfolgerung:
Für die Mehrheit der befragten Hebammen in der Geburtshilfe stehen berufliche Verausgabung und dafür erhaltene Gegenleistungen nicht im Verhältnis. Die hohe Prävalenz von Gratifikationskrisen in der Stichprobe kann als Prädiktor für zukünftige Berufsausstiege interpretiert werden. Dies ist ein deutlicher Hinweis auf zukünftige Leistungseinschränkungen in der Geburtshilfe in Bayern.