Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (7) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Article (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (7)
Keywords
- Physiotherapie (1)
- Stenose (1)
- lumbal (1)
- manual therapy (1)
- musicians (1)
- musicians health (1)
- musicians medicine (1)
- osteopathy (1)
- performing artists (1)
- physiotherapy (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (7)
Comparison of quantitative sensory testing profles between people living in Germany and Australia
(2021)
Currently, the treatment of musicians is an interprofessional approach. Playing-related health complaints may impact the performance of a musician. In Germany, a medical consulting hour for musicians exists, but those for athletes in sports medicine are not so common. The diagnosing and treatment procedure within the physiotherapy consultation for musicians follows a specific concept-b and requires knowledge of instruments and musician-specific complaints. Based on the consulting hour in a clinic in Osnabrueck, 614 case reports were part of this sample, of which 558 data sets were complete. The focus of the analysis is the instrument and the primary complaint. Also, the type of therapy is characterized, and the amount is calculated. Primary complaints of musicians, in general, are found most frequently in the spine and upper extremity. Musician complaints are different between instruments. Instrumentalists have a significantly higher chance to suffer from a primary complaint in the area of the upper extremity. Furthermore, the groups without an instrument (e.g., singing or dancing) are developing complaints in the anatomical area which they primarily use. Therefore, these types of therapy were used: physiotherapy, manual therapy, and osteopathy with an average of 5.9 treatment units. This study underpinned the importance of musician-specific physiotherapy as a profession to treat musicians. Also, an interdisciplinary approach is necessary to treat all aspects of complaints.
BACKGROUND: The Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI) is a cross-culturally adapted instrument designed from a biopsychosocial perspective to measure pain, disability, and function in orofacial head and neck pain with shown psychometric properties; however, the German cross-cultural adaption is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To carry out a transcultural translation of CF-PDI into German and assess its psychometric properties in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with respect to construct and clinical validity, internal consistency and reproducibility.
STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional design.
SETTING: Patients (n = 398) were recruited from dental and physical therapy clinics in middle and south Germany.
METHODS: Structural validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We investigated know-group validity by means of the scale’s potential to discriminate between affected and unaffected subjects. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to estimate convergent validity. We tested test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha, or each dimension separately, and the total score. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to estimate convergent validity.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six heterogeneous chronic craniofacial pain patients and 152 patients without complaints were recruited from the middle and south of Germany. The German version CF-PDI-G presents 21 items, 4 factors, and adequate psychometric properties. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the CF-PDI-G were both excellent for the entire instrument and also for all sub-scales (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.90) except for the comorbidities and interference with work which was acceptable (ICC = 0.69). Standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change values are sufficiently low. Assessment of clinical validity shows good potential of discrimination and classification into categories “no,” “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe.” The multiple linear regression model showed a strong association between neck disability index, Visual Analog Scale, and anamnestic questionnaire (supporting the scale’s convergent validity).
LIMITATIONS: Our sample has a higher prevalence of women and the sample was not recruited consecutively, which may lead to a biased estimation of psychometric properties.
CONCLUSIONS: The CF-PDI-G represents valid and reliable instrument to assess pain and disability in patients with orofacial pain and headache suitable for research and clinical practice.
Die Lumbale Spinalkanalstenose (LSS) bezeichnet eine symptomatische Verengung des Spinalkanals aufgrund einer kongenitalen Erkrankung (primäre LSS) oder eines degenerativen Prozesses (sekundäre LSS). Laut Schätzungen unterziehen sich 40 % aller von LSS betroffenen Patienten innerhalb der ersten 10 Jahre einem chirurgischen Eingriff. Ziel dieses Reviews ist, die Effektivität einer Rehabilitation, einschließlich individualisierter Physiotherapie, mit der herkömmlichen Versorgung nach einer Operation der LSS zu vergleichen.
Die Datenbanken CENTRAL, MEDLINE, DIMDI, PEDro und PubMed wurden systematisch nach randomisierten kontrollierten Studien durchsucht, die bis November 2018 durchgeführt wurden. Vier Studien wurden in den Review eingeschlossen. Die Gesamtqualität der Evidenz erwies sich dabei als moderat. Die Interventionen erfolgten unmittelbar während des Krankenhausaufenthalts oder innerhalb von 6–12 Wochen postoperativ und beinhalteten statt individualisierter Physiotherapie lediglich unspezifische Gruppentherapie. Die Kontrollgruppen erhielten herkömmliche Versorgung oder Empfehlungen zum postoperativen Verhalten. Die Analyse ergab keine Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen in Bezug auf funktionellen Status und Rückenschmerzen kurz- und langfristig. Lediglich bezüglich Beinschmerzen zeigte sich eine signifikante Differenz zugunsten der Interventionsgruppe (SMD –0,22, 95 % KI –0,43 bis –0,01).
Nicht individuelle Physiotherapie zeigt demnach im Vergleich zur herkömmlichen Versorgung keine kurzfristigen Effekte hinsichtlich Funktion und Schmerz, jedoch einen kleinen klinisch relevanten und signifikanten langfristigen Effekt im Hinblick auf Beinschmerzen. Die geringe Anzahl an eingeschlossenen Studien und die moderate Qualität der Evidenz unterstreichen die dringende Notwendigkeit qualitativ hochwertiger Studien, die die Wirkung einer individualisierten, patientenzentrierten und evidenzbasierten Physiotherapie untersuchen.