Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (107)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Other (4)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Book (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (123)
Keywords
- Neurodynamik (4)
- Manuelle Therapie (3)
- Chronischer Schmerz (2)
- Kokzygodynie (2)
- Neurodynamics (2)
- Sonografie (2)
- Ultrasound (2)
- dentale Okklusion (2)
- manual therapy (2)
- muskuloskeletale Therapie (2)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (121)
Introduction
Observations show that foam rolling improves joint movements. Likewise, it can be stated that a vibration stimulation of the tissue leads to improved joint mobility.
Method
This study investigates whether the combination of foam rolling and vibrations (31 Hz) can influence the sliding of the thoracolumbar fascia more effectively than normal foam rolling. 45 subjects participated in the study and were divided into a foam roll with additional vibration group (FRV), a foam roll group (FR) and a control group (CG). The intervention groups rolled out the gluteal muscles, the lateral trunk and the upper and lower back. Mobility measures were taken pre and post the respective intervention. Subsequent cross correlation software analysis quantified the sliding of the fascia and calculated its shear strain mobility (SSM).
Results
The sliding of the thoracolumbar fascia improved significantly within the FRV by 2.83 mm (SD ± 1.08/p < .001), in the FR by 0.96 mm (SD ± 0.43/p < .001) and in the CG decreased the sliding by 0.1401 mm (SD ± 0.28/p = .076). The fascia/fascia SSM increased in the FRV by 22.61% (SD ± 15.64/p < .001), in the FR by 11.41% (SD ± 20.38/p = .056) and in the CG decreased the SSM by 0.9473% (SD ± 11.35/p < .751). The lumbar movement increased in both intervention groups, but showed no significant result.
Conclusion
The use of a foam roll with additional vibration and standard intervention have increased thoracolumbar fascia sliding and lumbar movements. The improved shear strain mobility can be attributed to the multi-activity of mechanoreceptors, such as Pacini- and Ruffini-Bodies.
The management of patients experiencing chronic orofacial pain is a great challenge, due to the complexity of chronic pain itself, combined with an increased peripheral sensitization in the craniofacial itself. Therefore, patients with orofacial pain may present a clear distortion of the somatorepresentation after some time. In this review, the authors develop a neurophysiological explanation of orofacial distortion, as well as propose assessment and treatment options, based on scarcely available scientific evidence and their own clinical experience. The assessments of facial somatosensory, cognitive-affective and motor dysfunctions are crucial to establish the most accurate treatment; the assessment tools are described in the article. Two-point discrimination, laterality recognition and emotion recognition are altered in patients with orofacial pain. Other sensorimotor assessment tools, such as motor acuity and auditory acuity, are also explained. Finally, the authors review their treatment proposals, based on the integration of brain training techniques and biobehavioral interventions. Somatosensory reintegration (tactile acuity training), facial emotion recognition, movement representation techniques, orofacial motor training and therapeutic patient education are explained in detail, and this may challenge new directions in rehabilitation and research.
BACKGROUND: The Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI) is a cross-culturally adapted instrument designed from a biopsychosocial perspective to measure pain, disability, and function in orofacial head and neck pain with shown psychometric properties; however, the German cross-cultural adaption is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To carry out a transcultural translation of CF-PDI into German and assess its psychometric properties in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with respect to construct and clinical validity, internal consistency and reproducibility.
STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional design.
SETTING: Patients (n = 398) were recruited from dental and physical therapy clinics in middle and south Germany.
METHODS: Structural validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We investigated know-group validity by means of the scale’s potential to discriminate between affected and unaffected subjects. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to estimate convergent validity. We tested test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha, or each dimension separately, and the total score. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to estimate convergent validity.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six heterogeneous chronic craniofacial pain patients and 152 patients without complaints were recruited from the middle and south of Germany. The German version CF-PDI-G presents 21 items, 4 factors, and adequate psychometric properties. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the CF-PDI-G were both excellent for the entire instrument and also for all sub-scales (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.90) except for the comorbidities and interference with work which was acceptable (ICC = 0.69). Standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change values are sufficiently low. Assessment of clinical validity shows good potential of discrimination and classification into categories “no,” “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe.” The multiple linear regression model showed a strong association between neck disability index, Visual Analog Scale, and anamnestic questionnaire (supporting the scale’s convergent validity).
LIMITATIONS: Our sample has a higher prevalence of women and the sample was not recruited consecutively, which may lead to a biased estimation of psychometric properties.
CONCLUSIONS: The CF-PDI-G represents valid and reliable instrument to assess pain and disability in patients with orofacial pain and headache suitable for research and clinical practice.
Background
A wide range of physical tests have been published for use in the assessment of musculoskeletal dysfunction in patients with headache. Which tests are used depends on a physiotherapist's clinical and scientific background as there is little guidance on the most clinically useful tests.
Objectives
To identify which physical examination tests international experts in physiotherapy consider the most clinically useful for the assessment of patients with headache.
Design/methods
Delphi survey with pre-specified procedures based on a systematic search of the literature for physical examination tests proposed for the assessment of musculoskeletal dysfunction in patients with headache.
Results
Seventeen experts completed all three rounds of the survey. Fifteen tests were included in round one with eleven additional tests suggested by the experts. Finally eleven physical examination tests were considered clinically useful: manual joint palpation, the cranio-cervical flexion test, the cervical flexion-rotation test, active range of cervical movement, head forward position, trigger point palpation, muscle tests of the shoulder girdle, passive physiological intervertebral movements, reproduction and resolution of headache symptoms, screening of the thoracic spine, and combined movement tests.
Conclusions
Eleven tests are suggested as a minimum standard for the physical examination of musculoskeletal dysfunctions in patients with headache.
Objective
Gross mandibular position and masticatory muscle activity have been shown to influence cervical muscles electromyographic activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of three different mandible positions including conscious occlusion, tongue tip against the anterior hard palate (Palate tongue position) and natural resting position (Rest), on sagittal plane cervical spine range of motion (ROM) as well as the flexion-rotation test (FRT) in asymptomatic subjects.
Materials and methods
An experienced single blinded examiner evaluated ROM using an Iphone in 22 subjects (7 females; mean age of 29.91years, SD 5.44).
Results
Intra-rater reliability for range recorded was good for the FRT with ICC (intraclass correlation) 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98) and good for sagittal plane cervical ROM with ICC 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77–0.96). A repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean ROM recorded during the FRT differed significantly between assessment points (F(1.99, 41.83) = 19.88, P < 0.001). Bonferroni Post hoc tests revealed that both conscious Occlusion and Palate tongue position elicited a significant large reduction in ROM recorded during the FRT from baseline (p < 0.01). Despite this, one activation strategy did not influence ROM more than the other. An additional repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean sagittal cervical ROM did not significantly vary between assessment points (F(2, 42) = 8.18, P = 0.08).
Conclusion
This current study provided further evidence for the influence of the temporomandibular region on upper cervical ROM. Results suggest that clinicians should focus on the natural mandible rest position when evaluating upper cervical mobility.
Objective:
To compare the short- and long-term effects of a structural-oriented (convential) with an activity-oriented physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with frozen shoulder.
Design:
Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study.
Setting:
Outpatient clinic.
Subjects:
We included patients diagnosed with a limited range of motion and pain in the shoulder region, who had received a prescription for physiotherapy treatment, without additional symptoms of dizziness, a case history of headaches, pain and/or limited range of motion in the cervical spine and/or temporomandibular joint.
Interventions:
The study group received treatment during the performance of activities. The comparison group was treated with manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (conventional therapy). Both groups received 10 days of therapy, 30 minutes each day.
Main measures:
Range of motion, muscle function tests, McGill pain questionnaire and modified Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log were measured at baseline, after two weeks of intervention and after a three-month follow-up period without therapy.
Results:
A total of 66 patients were randomized into two groups: The activity-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 44 years, SD = 16 years) including 20 male (61%) and the structural-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 47 years, SD = 17 years) including 21 male (64%). The activity-oriented group revealed significantly greater improvements in the performance of daily life activities and functional and structural tests compared with the group treated with conventional therapy after 10 days of therapy and at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Therapy based on performing activities seems to be more effective for pain reduction and the ability to perform daily life activities than conventional treatment methods.
Hintergrund
Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die Auswirkungen einer Kinesiophobie auf die Emotions- sowie Lateralitätserkennung zu untersuchen.
Material und Methoden
67 Probanden mit chronischen muskuloskeletalen Schmerzen wurden untersucht. Hierbei erzielten 24 Probanden einen Wert von >37 auf der Tampa-Skala für Kinesiophobie und wurden in die Querschnittstudie eingeschlossen. Die Fähigkeit zur Erkennung mimisch codierter Basisemotionen wurde mittels des Facially-Expressed-Emotion-Labeling(FEEL)-Tests und die Lateralitätserkennung anhand eines speziellen Face-Mirroring-Assessment-and-Treatment-Programms ermittelt. Die Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala (TAS) 26 diente zur Erfassung einer Alexithymie.
Ergebnisse
Der FEEL-Score der Probanden mit Kinesiophobie war signifikant niedriger (p = 0,019). Die Basisemotionen Angst (p = 0,026), Ärger (p = 0,027) und Überraschung (p = 0,014) verdeutlichten einen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den Ergebnissen der Querschnittstudie und gesunden Probanden. Der Alexithymiefragebogen TAS-26 zeigte lediglich in der TAS 1 (Schwierigkeiten bei der Identifikation von Gefühlen; p = 0,008) einen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen Probanden mit Kinesiophobie.
Schlussfolgerung
Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass kinesiophobische Patienten Veränderungen in der Emotions- und Lateralitätserkennung sowie alexithyme Merkmale aufweisen.
Hintergrund
Achillodynie wird häufig als Zeichen einer Überlastung der Achillessehne gesehen. Eine neurogene Komponente dieses Krankheitsbilds wird ebenfalls in Betracht gezogen. Bislang wurde dieser Zusammenhang nicht untersucht.
Ziel
Das Ziel dieser Studie bestand darin, das Bewegungsverhalten des N. suralis bei Bewegungen von Sprung-, Knie- und Hüftgelenk zu untersuchen. Besonderes Interesse galt dem physiologischen Zustand sowie pathologischen Aspekten bei Achillodynie.
Methode
In dieser Querschnittstudie ohne Verblindung wurden 29 Suralnerven von 15 gesunden Probanden (Gruppe A) und 6 Suralnerven von 3 Probanden mit Schmerzen oder Missempfinden der Achillessehne oder des lateralen Fußrands (Gruppe B) mittels diagnostischem Ultraschall untersucht.
Ergebnisse
Der N. suralis wies eine durchschnittliche Größe von 3,7 mm2 (± 0,05 mm2) bei Gruppe A und 4,1 mm2 (± 0,1 mm2) bei Gruppe B auf. Die laterale (Mlat) und anterior-posteriore (Map) Bewegung des N. suralis war bei Gruppe A beim Bewegungsweg von Dorsalextension zu Plantarflexion mit 3,89 mm in lateraler und 0,56 mm in anterior-posteriorer Richtung signifikant größer als bei Knieflexion und -extension (Mlat: p = 0,008; Map: p = 0,0115) sowie Hüftabduktion und -adduktion (Mlat: p = 0,0025; Map: p = 0,002). Innerhalb dieser Studie konnten signifikante Unterschiede zwischen beiden Gruppen bezüglich des Bewegungsverhaltens und der Größe des Nervs nicht nachgewiesen werden.
Schlussfolgerung
Der N. suralis weist bei Fußbewegung ein signifikant größeres Bewegungsausmaß in transversaler Richtung auf als bei Knieflexion und -extension sowie Hüftgelenkabduktion und -adduktion.
Hintergrund
Basisemotionen werden über die Mimik ausgedrückt und sind ein wichtiger Kommunikator zur Außenwelt. Patienten mit Parkinson verlieren diese Fähigkeit aufgrund des häufig auftretenden so genannten Maskengesichts.
Ziel
Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Emotionserkennung und -wahrnehmung zwischen Patienten mit Parkinson und gesunden Menschen zu identifizieren.
Methode
34 medikamentös eingestellte Patienten mit Parkinson wurden anhand des Facially Expressed Emotion Labeling Tests (FEEL) auf ihre Emotionserkennung anderer Personen und anhand der Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala-26 (TAS) auf ihre Wahrnehmung der eigenen Emotionen untersucht. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit den Daten aus bereits vorliegenden Studien verglichen.
Ergebnisse
Patienten mit Parkinson hatten signifikante Probleme beim Erkennen von Emotionen in der Mimik im Vergleich zu Gesunden (p ≤ 0,001). Zusätzlich brauchten sie signifikant länger, die Ausdrücke den korrekten Emotionen zuzuordnen (p ≤ 0,001). Dabei korrelierte das Endergebnis des FEEL-Tests sehr stark mit der Reaktionszeit (p ≤ 0,001; r = –0,665). Auch die Wahrnehmung der eigenen Emotionen (TAS-26) war bei ihnen stark eingeschränkt (p ≤ 0,001). Der Zusammenhang zwischen den Ergebnissen des FEEL-Tests und der TAS-26 war gering (p = 0,020; r = –0,404).
Schlussfolgerung
Patienten mit Parkinson zeigten Beeinträchtigungen, Gesichtsausdrücke zu erkennen und sie den passenden Emotionen zuzuordnen. Merkmale einer Alexithymie konnten aber nicht festgestellt werden. Patienten mit einer guten Emotionserkennung scheinen geringere Schwierigkeiten zu haben, ihre eigenen Gefühle wahrzunehmen.
Due to new research results in the past few years, interest in the fascia of the human body has increased. Dysfunctions of the fascia are indicated by various symptoms, amongst others, musculoskeletal pain. As a result stronger focus has been put on researching therapeutic approaches in this area. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Foam Roll exercises on the mobility of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF). Study has been conducted in a randomized and controlled trial which sampled 38 healthy athletic active men and women.
The subjects were randomly assigned to a Foam Roll Group (FMG), a Placebo Group (PG) and a Control Group (CG). Depending on the assigned group the volunteers were either instructed to do exercises with the Foam Roll, received a pseudo treatment with the Foam Roll or received no treatment.
A total of three measurements were carried out. The most important field of research was the mobility of the TLF, which was determined using a sonographic assessment. In addition the lumbar flexion and the mechanosensivity of relevant muscles were determined.
After the intervention, the FMG showed an average increase of 1.7915 mm for the mobility of the TLF (p < 0.001/d = 0.756). In contrast, only an average improvement of 0.1681 mm (p = 0.397) was shown in the PG, while the CG showed a slight improvement of 0.0139 mm (p = 0.861). However, no significant changes were observed with regard to the lumbar flexion and mechanosensivity of the treated muscles.
Thus, evidence is that the use of Foam Roll exercises significantly improves the mobility of the thoracolumbar fascia in a healthy young population.