Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (23) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (23)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (23)
Institute
Relationship Marketing
(2017)
Nachhaltigkeitsmarketing
(2017)
Das duale Studium verbindet eine theoriebasierte Wissensvermittlung mit dem Auf- und Ausbau praxisbasierter Erfahrungen in Betrieben und wird sowohl in ausbildungs-/praxisintegrierenden als auch berufsintegrierenden Studienformaten angeboten. Ziel ist es, duale Studiengänge dahingehend zu analysieren, ob und inwiefern aus der Theorie-Praxis-Vernetzung ein erweiterter Beitrag zur Kompetenzentwicklung ableitbar ist. In besonderem Fokus steht dabei, die Wissenschaftlichkeit in diesen eher als praxisnah wahrgenommenen Studiengangsformen herauszuarbeiten. Grundlage hierzu ist ein Kompetenzmodell für duale Studiengänge, das auf einem potenziellen Spannungsfeld zwischen der Kompetenz zum wissenschaftlichen Denken und Handeln und den instrumentalen Kompetenzen als Erklärungsansatz fußt. Erste Erfahrungen in der Anwendung des Modellansatzes werden anhand empirischer Ergebnisse reflektiert.
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to present the current empirical research examining communication, compensation and logistics as elements of product crises management in retailing.
Design/methodology/approach
– The advantages and disadvantages of these three elements of crises response strategies are juxtaposed drawing on relevant empirical research. For each element of crises response the major findings of research are summarized and shown how it relates to crisis management. Needs for further research that would be necessary to solidify recommendations to retail managers are derived.
Findings
– The investigation finds that both communicative and compensatory response elements as well as the retailer's logistics can positively influence evaluations of customers directly and indirectly affected by product problems thus enhancing brand equity. This in turn will serve to increase consumers' trust in the retailer that could win him new customers and generally benefit his reputation.
Research limitations/implications
– Most of the discussed research rests on the assumption of a given (extraneous) crisis response strategy of the manufacturer. Potential problems concerning the co‐ordination or implementation of manufacturer and retailer strategies remain open to question. Additionally, further research should examine which strategies are appropriate to which crisis situation.
Practical implications
– Materially, over‐compensating customers often has a detrimental effect on solving the crisis. The impact of different compensation types on crisis resolution mostly depends on their respective signalling capabilities, the product problem constituting the crisis and consumer attributions. The use and the effects of a communicative crisis response largely depend on moderating factors such as the retailer's reputation or the existence of strong retail brands and consumer expectations. Elements of logistics seem to support the effects of communication and compensation on crisis resolution but are hardly capable of solving a product‐harm crisis.
Originality/value
– The role of retailers in product‐harm crisis management has been widely neglected in research although such crises are predominant. This paper outlines the current empirical work on how different crises response elements may contribute to solving a product‐harm crisis for retailers. It derives relevant avenues for further research as well as useful insights to practitioners considering to using such response elements in their own crisis management strategy.
This research paper analyzes the role of pre-crisis
reputation for quality on consumers ’ perceptions of
product-related dangers and company responsibility
in product-harm crises with varying risk information.
We consider (non-) substantiated public
complaints incorporating low and moderate product-
related risks, as well as product-recall situations
involving serious risks to the health and safety of
consumers. Hypotheses are derived from theories
and concepts of consumer behavioural psychology.
These are then tested empirically by using an
online experiment. The effects of reputation are
analyzed across different crises contexts to derive
some general insights useful for crisis management.
In order to shed light on situational differences of
the reputation mechanism its effect on individual
crisis level will also be considered. In general, the
analysis fi nds that reputation for quality is capable
of positively infl uencing the perceptions of company
responsibility and thereby shielding the
manufacturer from receiving blame. However, an
established reputation for high product quality
prior to the crisis fails to positively impacting
consumers ’ perceptions of problem severity. The
crisis-specifi c effects of reputation turn out to be
ambivalent. On the basis of these fi ndings, recommendations
to crisis managers and relevant avenues
for future research are derived.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) gewinnt auch in Europa weiter an Bedeutung. So hat die Europäische Kommission kürzlich eine CSR-Strategie vorgelegt. Ihr liegt eine neue Definition zugrunde, nach der CSR „die Verantwortung von Unternehmen für ihre Auswirkungen auf die Gesellschaft“ ist (Europäische Kommission 2011: 7). Die Auswirkungen gefährlicher Industriechemikalien auf Mensch und Umwelt sind Gegenstand der EU-Chemikalienverordnung REACH (Verordnung [EG] Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe). Die 2007 in Kraft getretene REACH-Verordnung sieht für die Unternehmen weitreichende Verpflichtungen vor, für einen sicheren Umgang mit Stoffen zu sorgen und Risiken für Verbraucher, Arbeitnehmer und die Umwelt zu minimieren. Dies betrifft sowohl Hersteller von chemischen Stoffen als auch Unternehmen in zahlreichen anderen Branchen (z. B. Hersteller und Händler von Verbraucherprodukten wie Spielwaren oder Textilien).
In der Diskussion zu den ökonomischen Auswirkungen von REACH steht häufig der Bürokratie- und Ressourcenaufwand in den Unternehmen im Vordergrund, der durch neue Pflichten (z. B. Registrierungs- und Meldepflichten) verursacht wird. Der positive Beitrag, den die REACH-Erfüllung zur Verbesserung der Corporate Social Performance leisten kann, wird hingegen noch wenig erkannt. Dabei zeigt sich, dass dem CSR-Konzept und REACH in Bereichen wie der Nachhaltigkeitsorientierung, der Wahrnehmung von Produkt- und Umweltverantwortung u. a. gemeinsame Ziele und Ansätze zugrunde liegen. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeigt beispielhaft auf, wo Gemeinsamkeiten liegen und wie diese von Unternehmen im Rahmen der CSR-Strategie aufgegriffen werden können.
The candidate list of substances subject to authorisation is an instrument provided by the EU chemicals regulation (REACH) to publicly announce and prioritize chemical substances of very high concern (SVHC) as a first step of imposing an obligation of authorisation on them, i.e. including them into the authorisation list (Annex XIV of REACH). As a consequence of inclusion into the “candidate list”, a variety of obligations concerned with intensifying risk communication apply. Article producers, importers and distributors of articles have to communicate information about SVHCs contained in articles and necessary risk management measures to the recipients of the articles and provide this information to consumers on request (Art. 33 REACH). This research paper analyzes the reputational mechanism of the candidate list showing a potential to stigmatize not only the substances as such but also various actors of the supply chain associated with these substances and their brands. Drawing on behavioral psychology theories, hypotheses on the reputational impacts of the candidate list on substance manufacturers, downstream users (including formulators and manufacturers of articles) and distributors are derived. These are discussed on the basis of current empirical data surveyed by the European Commission.