Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (2)
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (2) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- Bootstrapping (1)
- Cut Points (1)
- LSAS (1)
- ROC (1)
- SPAI (1)
- bootstrap (1)
- cut point (1)
- receiver operating characteristics (1)
- social anxiety (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (2)
Objective:
The German version of the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI-G) is avalidated measure for the detection of social anxiety disorder (SAD). The aim of the presentstudy was to develop optimal cut points (OC) for remission and response to treatment for theSPAI-G.
Methods:
We used Receiver Operating Characteristic methods and bootstrapping to analysethe data of 359 patients after psychotherapeutic treatment. OCs where defined as the cut pointswith the highest sensitivity and specificity after bootstrapping.
Results:
For remission, an OC of 2.79 was found, and for response, a change in score frompre- to posttreatment by 11% yielded best results.
Conclusions:
The OC we identified for remission may be used to improve the diagnostic utilityof the SPAI-G. However, the cut point for response achieved only borderline-acceptable levelsof sensitivity and specificity, calling into doubt their utility in clinical and research setting.
The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) is the most frequently used instrument to assess social anxiety disorder (SAD) in clinical research and practice. Both a self‐reported (LSAS‐SR) and a clinician‐administered (LSAS‐CA) version are available. The aim of the present study was to define optimal cut‐off (OC) scores for remission and response to treatment for the LSAS in a German sample.
Data of N = 311 patients with SAD were used who had completed psychotherapeutic treatment within a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Diagnosis of SAD and reduction in symptom severity according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, served as gold standard. OCs yielding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity were determined using receiver operating characteristics. The variability of the resulting OCs was estimated by nonparametric bootstrapping.
Using diagnosis of SAD (present vs. absent) as a criterion, results for remission indicated cut‐off values of 35 for the LSAS‐SR and 30 for the LSAS‐CA, with acceptable sensitivity (LSAS‐SR: .83, LSAS‐CA: .88) and specificity (LSAS‐SR: .82, LSAS‐CA: .87). For detection of response to treatment, assessed by a 1‐point reduction in the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, rating, a reduction of 28% for the LSAS‐SR and 29% for the LSAS‐CA yielded the best balance between sensitivity (LSAS‐SR: .75, LSAS‐CA: .83) and specificity (LSAS‐SR: .76, LSAS‐CA: .80).
To our knowledge, we are the first to define cut points for the LSAS in a German sample. Overall, the cut points for remission and response corroborate previously reported cut points, now building on a broader data basis.