Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (173) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (77)
- Conference Proceeding (29)
- Part of a Book (24)
- Book (12)
- Moving Images (12)
- Other (11)
- Report (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- German (129)
- English (43)
- Portuguese (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (173) (remove)
Keywords
- Hebammen (2)
- wissenschaftliche Weiterbildung (2)
- Agile Unternehmenswelt (1)
- Anrechnung (1)
- Athlete management (1)
- Bootstrapping (1)
- CEO (1)
- CEO-CIO relationship (1)
- Career success (1)
- Cerebral palsy (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (173) (remove)
Die rechtliche Grundlage für die Prüfung der Krankenhausabrechnung durch den MDK ergibt sich aus § 275 SGB V und § 17c KHG. Der GKV-Spitzenverband und die deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft haben sich zur Durchführung der Krankenhausabrechnungsprüfung auf die Prüfverfahrensvereinbarungen geeinigt. Zusätzlich wurden die sogenannten G-AEP Kriterien zur Fehlbelegungsprüfung entwickelt. Des Weiteren zählt der AOP Katalog die ambulant durchführbaren Operationen und sonstige stationsersetzende Eingriffe abschließend auf.
Die Analyse der Unfallchirurgie zeigt, dass die Prüfquote von 2011 bis 2016 durchschnittlich bei 14,50 % liegt. Die in dem untersuchten Zeitraum erfolgten Rechnungskürzungen der Krankenhausabrechnungen, durch die Krankenkassen, liegen bei 1.800.191 EUR. Das entspricht einem prozentualen Fallverlust von 2,57 %. Die Hauptanfragegründe, welche den größten Anteil am Fallverlust tragen, sind die Überschreitung der uGVD und oGVD, sowie die geriatrische Komplexbehandlung.
Die Analyse der Kardiologie zeigt, dass die Prüfquote in den untersuchten Jahren durchschnittlich bei 14,88 % liegt. In diesem Zeitraum wurde, durch die Abrechnungsprüfung, ein Fallverlust von 1.736.142 EUR verursacht. Das entspricht einem prozentualen Fallverlust von 2,56 %. Die Hauptanfragegründe, die den größten Anteil am Fallverlust tragen, sind die Überschreitung der uGVD und oGVD, sowie die Kodierung der Haupt-/ und Nebendiagnosen.
Die Handlungsempfehlungen beinhalten die Implementierung eines MDK-Berichtswesens und die Optimierung des Prozessmanagements, beispielsweise durch Behandlungsleitfäden. Weitere Handlungsempfehlungen sind die Schulung der Kodierkräfte und Ärzte hinsichtlich der Kodierung von Haupt-/Nebendiagnosen und die Vereinfachung beziehungsweise Verbesserung der Dokumentation.
Das Daten- und Zahlenmaterial ist in dieser Studie so aufbereitet worden, dass eine Rückführung oder Herleitung auf die tatsächlich vorgefundenen Daten und Zahlen nicht möglich ist. Deshalb sind die Ausführungen beispielhaft zu verstehen. Die Zahlen sind aber in sich schlüssig, aus dem tatsächlichen Geschehen abgeleitet worden und verdeutlichen so das Vorgehen des MDK-Prüfverfahrens aus der Sicht eines Krankenhaues. Das HELIOS Klinikum Hildesheim hat die Ausgangsdaten zur Verfügung gestellt, die hier – wie oben beschrieben – beispielhaft entwickelt wurden. Frau Indra Schröter, Abteilungsleiterin Medizincontrolling und den beteiligten Mitarbeitern des Helios Klinikum Hildesheims, ist für ihre Unterstützung und Begleitung, für ihre hilfreichen Hinweise und kritischen Anmerkungen zu danken.
Objectives: The aims of this study were to define the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) and Color Analog Scale (CAS) scores associated with no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain in children with acute pain, and to identify differences based on age, sex, and ethnicity.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in 2 pediatric emergency departments of children aged 4 to 17 years with painful and nonpainful conditions. We assessed their pain intensity using the FPS-R, CAS, and qualitative measures. Pain score cut points that best differentiated adjacent categories of pain were identified using a receiver operating characteristic-based method. Cut points were compared within subgroups based on age, sex, and ethnicity.
Results: We enrolled 620 patients, of whom 314 had painful conditions. The mean age was 9.2 years; 315 (50.8%) were in the younger age group (aged 4-7 years); 291 (46.8%) were female; and 341 (55%) were Hispanic. The scores best representing categories of pain for the FPS-R were as follows: no pain, 0 and 2; mild pain, 4; moderate pain, 6; and severe pain, 8 and 10. For the CAS, these were 0 to 1, 1.25 to 2.75, 3 to 5.75, and 6 to 10, respectively. Children with no pain frequently reported nonzero pain scores. There was considerable overlap of scores associated with mild and moderate pain. There were no clinically meaningful differences of scores representing each category of pain based on age, ethnicity, and race.
Conclusions: We defined pain scores for the FPS-R and CAS associated with categories of pain intensity in children with acute pain that are generalizable across subgroups based on patient characteristics. There were minor but potentially important differences in pain scores used to delineate categories of pain intensity compared to prior convention.
As health IT supports processes along the entire patient trajectory and involves different types of professional groups, eHealth is inter-professional by nature. The aim of this study, therefore, is to investigate which competencies are at the intersection of the individual groups of health professionals. 718 international experts provided relevance ratings of eHealth competencies for different professional roles in an online survey. Communication and leadership proved to be important competencies across all professions, not only for executives. None or very little differences between professions were found between physicians and nurses, between IT experts at different levels and between IT experts and executives. However, there were a number of competencies rated differently when contrasting direct patient care specialists with executives. These findings should encourage organisations issuing educational recommendations to specify areas of shared competencies more extensively.
Background: IT is getting an increasing importance in hospitals. In this
context, major IT decisions are often made by CEOs who are not necessarily IT
experts. Objectives: Therefore, this study aimed at a) exploring different types of IT
decision makers at CEO level, b) identifying hypotheses if trust exists between these
different types of CEOs and their CIOs and c) building hypotheses on potential
consequences regarding risk taking and innovation. Methods: To this end, 14
qualitative interviews with German hospital CEOs were conducted to explore the
research questions. Results: The study revealed three major types: IT savvy CEOs,
IT enthusiastic CEOs and IT indifferent CEOs. Depending on these types, their
relationship with the CIO varied in terms of trust and common language. In case of
IT indifferent CEOs, a potential vicious circle of lack of IT knowledge, missing trust,
low willingness to take risks and low innovation power could be identified.
Conclusion: In order to break of this circle, CEOs seem to need more IT knowledge
and / or greater trust in their CIO.
Neurotension – Gestern und Heute. Wie ist der momentane Kenntnisstand, und wie setze ich ihn um?
(2018)
Objectives
To investigate differences in pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and longitudinal mechanosensitivity of the greater occipital nerve (GON) between patients with side-dominant head and neck pain (SDHNP) and healthy controls. Evaluation of neural sensitivity is not a standard procedure in the physical examination of headache patients but may influence treatment decisions.
Methods
Two blinded investigators evaluated PPTs on two different locations bilaterally over the GON as well as the occipitalis longsitting-slump (OLSS) in subjects with SDHNP (n = 38)) and healthy controls (n = 38).
Results
Pressure pain sensitivity of the GON was lower at the occiput in patients compared to controls (p = 0.001). Differences in pressure sensitivity of the GON at the nucheal line, or between the dominant headache side and the non-dominant side were not found (p > 0.05). The OLSS showed significant higher pain intensity in SDHNP (p < 0.001). In comparison to the non-dominant side, the dominant side was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.004).
Discussion
Palpation of the GON at the occiput and the OLSS may be potentially relevant tests in SDHNP. One explanation for an increased bilateral sensitivity may be sensitization mechanisms. Future research should investigate the efficacy of neurodynamic techniques directed at the GON.