500 Naturwissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Baustoff Holz (1)
- Dry grassland (1)
- Ex-arable field (1)
- Gruppendiskussionen (1)
- Hay transfer (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Red List species (1)
- Rinderhaltung (1)
- Sowing (1)
- Stallbau (1)
Institute
- Fakultät AuL (3)
- Fakultät IuI (1)
Establishment of calcareous grassland on ex-arable fields by introducing target species is one of the most frequently used methods to restore the species assemblages of this highly endangered habitat type. The present study evaluates the long-term success of calcareous grassland restoration on former arable land in the vicinity of one of the oldest nature reserves in Bavaria, the “Garchinger Heide”. The restoration experiment combined different measures like topsoil removal, transfer of freshly cut seed-containing hay and additional sowing to the following variants in a 21-year experiment: (1) No topsoil removal, no hay transfer (control), (2) no topsoil removal with immediate hay transfer, (3) topsoil removal with immediate hay transfer and (4) topsoil removal with hay transfer 10 years after the start of restoration. Eleven Red List species which had not been transferred successfully were additionally sown after 9 to 19 years. Due to a limited availability of seeds, sowing of these species was mainly restricted to areas with topsoil removal, where better establishment was expected due to low vegetation cover. Five rare species with abundant seed production were also sown to plots without topsoil removal and hay transfer. The nature reserve served both as the donor area of the target species and as the reference to evaluate restoration success. Regarding aboveground biomass and total vegetation cover, greatest similarity to the donor site was observed on plots without topsoil removal. In contrast, the highest numbers of target species occurred on plots with topsoil removal, hay transfer and additional sowing. Similarity in species composition between restoration sites and the reference area increased over time, but species composition of restored sites did not fully reflect the reference after 21 years. One reason for the remaining dissimilarity was probably that topsoil removal favored stress tolerant species which were less common on the mature and more fine-grained soils of the nature reserve. Plots without topsoil removal still differed from the reference by their high vegetation cover and a significantly higher proportion of mesophytic grassland species. The study also showed that 19 Red List species were successfully established on the former arable fields, eight of them presumably by sowing. Nevertheless, various other rare species have not been observed yet. Results on functional traits characterizing environmental adaptation and reproduction also underlined the differences between restoration plots and the reference site. Our study presents a ʽdynamic restoration approachʼ where managers evaluated the original factorial treatments after a decade and modified them by additional treatments where development was sub-optimal. Such additional treatments may have confounded the experimental design, but from a management perspective proved to be a promising option to establish species rich grassland of high conservation value with a reasonable expenditure of time.
Gebäude beanspruchen Ressourcen und verändern die Umwelt. Die Landwirtschaft benötigt oftmals großvolumige Gebäude. Eine nachhaltigere landwirtschaftliche Baukultur wäre deshalb begrüßenswert. Für das agrarische Bauen könnte eine verstärkte Verwendung des Rohstoffs Holz eine Perspektive darstellen. Holz überzeugt durch zahlreiche ökologische Vorteile wie die langfristige Kohlenstoffbindung oder eine einfache Recycelbarkeit. In Deutschland spielt Holz beim landwirtschaftlichen Bauen allerdings eine immer geringere Rolle. Diese Studie stellt Meinungsbilder deutscher LandwirtInnen zum Holzeinsatz beim Stallbau zusammen. Es wurden zehn Gruppendiskussionen zum Themenfeld landwirtschaftliche Baukultur in verschiedenen deutschen Schwerpunktregionen der Rinderhaltung gestaltet. Die Auswertungen zeigen, dass die LandwirtInnen weitestgehend die optische Wirkung von Holz schätzen, aber häufig an der Dauerhaftigkeit von Holzställen zweifeln.
The objective of this review is a global assessment of the economics of second‐generation biorefineries, with a focus on the use of food waste and agricultural residues for chemical production by applying biotechnological processes. Analyses are conducted on feedstock and product distribution, applied economic models, and profitability figures for the period 2013–2018. In a study of 163 articles on different biorefinery systems, the production of chemicals is identified as the second major product class, after bioenergy. Bagasse and straw are frequently analyzed second‐generation feedstocks. Based on the evaluation of 22 articles, second‐generation biorefineries producing chemicals by applying biotechnological processes proves to be economically feasible. On average, both the internal rate of return (IRR) and the return on investment (ROI) are 20% and the payback period (PP) is 6 years. The cost share of feedstock in biorefineries is between 0–50%. The price of the end product and the fermentation yields have the most impact on profitability. The processing of food waste that has industrial and municipal origins appears more economical than the processing of agricultural residues. Scientists, policy makers and entrepreneurs with an appropriate risk tolerance are advised to pay particular attention to municipal food waste and the potential economic production of carboxylic acids. For various economic issues related to biorefineries, dynamic‐deterministic models are recommended, which can be extended by a stochastic model. This review provides an initial overview of the economic feasibility of second‐generation biorefineries. Further techno‐economic analyses are required to produce statistically significant statements on key profitability figures. © 2020 The Authors. Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.