Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Keywords
- Commuting (2)
- Student mobility (2)
- University (2)
- En Route (1)
- Housing (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Online education (1)
- Online teaching (1)
- Practices (1)
- Residential location (1)
Institute
- Fakultät AuL (4)
Education-related travel accounts for 7% of all journeys in Germany (Nobis and Kuhnimhof, 2019). At Higher Education Institutions (HEI), student and staff mobility significantly contributes to overall CO2 emissions, with studies reporting shares of up to 91% (Helmers, Chang and Dauwels, 2021). Thus, both urban planners and HEIs are actively seeking effective policies for sustainable educational mobility to harness environmental, social, and health benefits (Delmelle and Delmelle, 2012).
In this context, online education emerges as a promising solution to avoid traffic. Similar to remote work models like home office, online education facilitates location-independent learning processes, potentially providing university students with more flexible study programs and greater freedom in choosing their place of residence, while reducing travel-related CO2 emissions and individual costs. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the feasibility of moving significant parts of HEI operations online, challenging the necessity for physical presence and commuting. Consequently, there have been calls to increase the share of online education as an effective strategy for sustainable mobility at HEIs (e.g., Versteijlen, van Wee and Wals, 2021).
However, some researchers come to a different conclusion. They imply that while online education may lead to an overall decrease in total commutes, there could be a simultaneous increase in the average commuting distance. Additionally, a shift towards less sustainable modes of transportation may occur as students relocate from urban centers to more peripheral areas with limited mobility options (e.g., O’Brien and Aliabadi, 2020).
Our submission contributes to this discussion by presenting new evidence from the EN ROUTE research project at Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences (HSOS), which investigates strategies to enhance the sustainability of university-related travel. Building on data from an online survey conducted among students attending the HSOS (n = 1057), we examine university-related mobility patterns of students in a mid-sized German city in relation to their residential locations and explore potential effects of online education. Particularly, we focus on three key aspects:
• How does university-related travel at HSOS look today?
• How is it related to questions of students‘ housing and transport infrastructure?
• How might mobility and housing patterns change in the wake of online education and how will this affect settlement structures?
The results highlight strong connections between aspects of mobility, housing and studying. Promoting sustainable mobility in digitized higher education is highly complex due to observable tensions between various environmental and social factors. In addition, the heterogeneity of students leads to a range of possible responses and reactions regarding mobility and housing patterns. While online education undoubtedly has great transformative potential, we advocate for a realistic assessment of its ecological value, including a detailed examination of potential rebound effects.
When the ECLAS Conference took place in 1972 western societies were undergoing profound change: They transformed from industrial to postindustrial societies – the so-called service societies. 50 years later, the knowledge society is emerging: Knowledge is considered the key resource of this era. Digitalization and widespread dissemination of ICT allow information to be obtained anywhere anytime. This has severe implications for individual lifestyles and everyday practices. Different aspects of living, learning and working are no longer bound to physical limitations but can be enhanced by or even transferred to the virtual space. So being on the move today means travelling in hybrid spaces. We call this the space and practice “en route”.
At the University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück we explore the following questions:
What does “en route” mean and look like in landscapes of higher education?
How is it perceived individually?
(How) can landscape architecture shape it?
Our transdisciplinary research project EN ROUTE aims to meet current challenges at universities (e.g. digitalisation, sustainable development) with a comprehensive understanding of space and practices “en route”. In a transdisciplinary process, researchers from various disciplines – landscape architecture, geography, urban planning, business administrations and marketing, energy technology and computer science – develop concepts and strategies for sustainable and digital mobility in the higher education sector. New “EN ROUTE” types provide insights into the individual production and utilization of spaces “en route”.
The campuses of the University of Applied Science Osnabrück as well as the virtual and physical space network of its members serve as research example. Initial findings will be presented at the conference. While the ECLAS conference in 1972 focused on physical scales, landscape architecture has to reflect them critically and ask: What could be an innovative understanding of spaces “en route”?
Purpose
Online education enables location-independent learning, potentially providing university students with more flexible study programs and reducing traffic-related CO2 emissions. This paper examines whether online education can contribute to university-related sustainable everyday mobility, with particular consideration given to aspects of social sustainability and potential rebound effects. Specifically, it explores sustainability dilemmas that arise from conflicting social and ecological effects.
Design/methodology/approach
Drawing on qualitative data from mobility diaries and extensive semi-structured interviews (n = 26) collected at Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences in Germany, this study deploys thematic analysis and a typification approach to analyze and classify students’ daily practices related to studying, mobility, and dwelling, which may be impacted by online education.
Findings
The study identifies six distinct student types with diverse practices in studying, mobility, and dwelling. Comparisons between student types reveal stark differences regarding professional and social goals that students associate with their studies, influencing university-related mobility and residential choices. This leads to varying assessments of online education, with some students expecting benefits and others anticipating severe drawbacks.
Practical implication
The typology developed in this paper can assist HEIs in comparable contexts in understanding the distinct needs and motivations of students, thereby proactively identifying sustainability dilemmas associated with online education. By leveraging these findings, HEIs can effectively balance diverse interests and contribute meaningfully to sustainability. Originality/value – This study is among the first to systematically investigate conflicts and rebound effects of online education in the context of sustainable mobility within HEIs.