Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (13) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (8)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (13)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (13)
Background: Clinical information logistics is the backbone of care workflows inside and outside of hospitals. Due to the great potential of health IT to support clinical processes its contribution needs to be regularly monitored and governed. IT benchmarks are a well-known instrument to optimise the availability and use of IT by guiding the decision making process. The aim of this study was to translate IT benchmarking results that were grounded on a hierarchical workflow scoring system into an appropriate visualisation concept.
Methods: To this end, a three-dimensional multi-level model was developed, which allowed the decomposition of the highly aggregated workflow composite score into score views for the individual clinical workflows concerned and for the descriptors of these workflows. Furthermore this multi-level model helped to break down the score views into single and multiple indicator views.
Results: The results could be visualised per hospital in comparison to the results of organisations of similar size and ownership (peer reference groups) and in comparison to different types of innovation adopters. The multi-level model was implemented in a benchmark of 199 hospitals and evaluated by the chief information officers. The evaluation resulted in high ratings for the comprehensibility of the different types of views of the scores and indicators.
Conclusions: The implementation of the multi-level model in a large benchmark of hospitals proved to be feasible and useful in terms of the overall structure and the different indicator views. There seems to be a preference for less complex and familiar views.
Background: The majority of health IT adoption research focuses on the later stages of the IT adoption process: namely on the implementation phase. The first stage, however, which is defined as the knowledge-stage, remains widely unobserved. Following Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) this paper presents a research framework to examine the possible lack of shared IT awareness-knowledge, i.e. an information gradient, of two crucial stakeholders, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Director of Nursing (DoN). This study shall answer the following research questions: (1.) Does this gradient exist? (2.) Which direction does it have? (3.) Are certain health IT (HIT) attributes associated with a potential gradient? (4.) Which determinants of diffusion go along with this gradient?
Method: Results of two surveys that focused on the topic “IT support of clinical workflows” from the viewpoint of CIOs and DoNs with corresponding datasets from 75 hospitals were used in a secondary data analysis. The gradient was operationalised by measuring the disagreement of CIOs and DoNs on the availability and implementation status of 29 IT functions. HIT attributes tested were relevance and market penetration of the IT functions, determinants of diffusion were inter-professional leadership and IT service density.
Results: The analysis revealed a significant disagreement on the availability of 9 out of 29 HIT functions. In 23 HIT functions, the CIOs reported a higher implementation status than the DoNs, which pointed to a trend for a unidirectional gradient. The disagreement was significantly lower when the relevance of the IT function was high. Both determinants of diffusion correlated significantly negative with the degree of disagreement.
Conclusion: This is the first study to empirically examine shared awareness-knowledge of two IT-stakeholders that are crucial for triggering IT adoption on the frontline level in hospitals. It could be shown that a gradient and thus a lack of shared awareness-knowledge existed and was associated with certain factors. In conclusion, hospitals should implement improved cooperation between IT staff and clinicians and IT service density when establishing the prerequisites for successful IT adoption processes.
Innovation braucht Freiraum
(2016)
Innovationen sind positiv besetzt. Deshalb reicht es nicht aus, dass etwas „neu“ ist, es muss „innovativ“ sein. Viele verbinden das mit etwas Sensationellem, das große Aufmerksamkeit auf sich lenkt und das revolutionäre Veränderungen mit sich bringt – am besten schlagartig. Gerne werden auch alle technischen Neuerungen als Innovationen bezeichnet. Aber stimmt das denn auch?
Dienstleister oder Diktator?
(2016)
Die IT in der Rolle eines Dienstleisters zu sehen, ist an unseren Krankenhäusern leider selten Realität. Denn der IT-Diktator zieht gerne in Form überbordender IT-gestützter Dokumentation durch die Arzt- und Stationszimmer. Das sei dann dem „Diktat der DRG" geschuldet, so die Begründung. Aber muss das so sein?
Innovations are typically characterised by their relative newness for the user. In order for new eHealth applications to be accepted as innovations more criteria were proposed including “use” and “usability”. The handoverEHR is a new approach that allows the user to translate the essentials of a clinical case into a graphical representation, the so-called cognitive map of the patient. This study aimed at testing the software usability. A convenience sample of 23 experienced nurses from different healthcare organisations across the country rated the usability of the handoverEHR after performing typical handover tasks. All usability scales of the IsoMetricsL questionnaire showed positive values (4 “I agree”) with the exception of “error tolerance” (3 “neutral statement”). A significant improvement was found in self-descriptiveness as compared to an initial usability testing prior to this study. Different subgroups of users tended to rate the usability of the system differently. This study demonstrated the benefits of formative evaluations in terms of improving the usability of an entirely new approach. It thus helps to transform a novel piece of software towards becoming a real innovation. Our findings also hint at the importance of user characteristics that could affect the usability ratings.
Benchmarking, sprich die Vergleichsanalyse von Prozessen mit festgelegtem Bezugswert, findet zunehmend Einzug in die Welt der Gesundheits-IT. Dabei spielen jedoch viele Faktoren zusammen, die einen einfachen Vergleich von IT-Kosten bei Weitem übersteigen. Eine Forschungsgruppe der Hochschule Osnabrück hat mit dem IT-Benchmark Gesundheitswesen ein Analysetool vorgelegt, das auch einen Länder- vergleich ermöglicht.
This workshop will review the history of the TIGER initiative in order to set the framework for an understanding of international informatics competencies. We will include a description of clinical nursing informatics programs in 37 countries as well as the results of a recent survey of nursing competencies in order to further discussions of internationally agreed-upon competency definitions. These two surveys will provide the basis for developing a consensus regarding the integration of core competencies into informatics curriculum developments. Expected outcomes include building consensus on core competencies and developing plans toward implementing intra- and inter-professional informatics competencies across disciplines globally.
The TIGER Initiative
(2016)
Hochschule und Universität Osnabrück haben mit regionalen Partnern (Stadt, Landkreis, Bistum, evangelisch-lutherischem Kirchenkreis, Kompetenzzentrum Gesundheitswirtschaft) die Grundsatzvereinbarung unterzeichnet, in Osnabrück einen Gesundheitscampus zu etablieren. Das Ziel ist, einen Ort zu schaffen, an dem Wissenschaft, Unternehmen der Gesundheitsversorgung, Träger von Gesundheitseinrichtungen und Politik zusammenkommen, um innovative Versorgungskonzepte für die Region zu erproben. „ROSE – das Lernende Gesundheitssystem in der Region Osnabrück-Emsland“ ist ein Großprojekt im Rahmen des Gesundheitscampus Osnabrück, das von dem Niedersächsischen Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK) über 5 Jahre gefördert wird. Dabei wird das Prinzip des Lernens durch Feedback angewendet. Das bedeutet, dass durch Forschung in und mit der Praxis Evidenz im Sinne von practice-based evidence erzeugt wird, d.h. Evidenz für eine bessere Versorgungspraxis unter Berücksichtigung städtischer und ländlicher Strukturen. Dies hat zur Konsequenz, dass der Transferprozess zwischen Hochschule und Versorgungspraxis nicht am Ende sondern bereits am Anfang steht. Mit dem Ansatz einer wiederkehrenden Abfolge von Forschungsfragen und Analysen von Daten aus der Versorgungspraxis rekurriert ROSE auf das Prinzip des „Learning Health Care System“ (IOM, 2007). Im Rahmen von ROSE stimmen sich Hochschule und Universität Osnabrück ab, um die Ziele des Gesundheitscampus zu erreichen. Die geplante Umsetzung wird anhand eines Modells mit fünf Maßnahmen vorgestellt. Diese bauen auf der Vielfalt von bereits bestehenden Gesundheitsstudiengängen in Osnabrück auf und bringen Forschung, Nachwuchsförderung und Translation von Forschungsergebnissen zusammen.
An Iterative Methodology for Developing National Recommendations for Nursing Informatics Curricula
(2016)
The increasing importance of IT in nursing requires educational measures to support its meaningful application. However, many countries do not yet have national recommendations for nursing informatics competencies. We thus developed an iterative triple methodology to yield validated and country specific recommendations for informatics core competencies in nursing. We identified relevant competencies from national sources (step 1), matched and enriched these with input from the international literature (step 2) and fed the resulting 24 core competencies into a survey (120 invited experts from which 87 responded) and two focus group sessions with a total of 48 experts (steps 3a/3b). The subsequent focus group sessions confirmed and expanded the findings. As a result, we were able to define role specific informatics core competencies for three countries.