Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (87)
- Part of a Book (36)
- Book (21)
- Report (6)
- Working Paper (4)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Other (1)
Language
- German (124)
- English (25)
- Portuguese (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (156)
Keywords
- Community health nursing (2)
- Expertenstandard (2)
- Häusliche Pflege (2)
- Informelle Pflege (2)
- Pflegeberatung (2)
- Akzeptanztheorie (1)
- Ambulanter Pflegedienst (1)
- Beratungsbesuch (1)
- Community care (1)
- Dekubitus (1)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (156) (remove)
Die Primärversorgung in Brasilien ist in den letzten Jahren international viel diskutiert worden. Dieser Beitrag skizziert die Entwicklung des Gesundheitssystems und ihren Bezug zum Demokratisierungsprozess in Brasilien. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Darstellung der Familiengesundheitsstrategie, die mit ihren Prinzipien des universellen Zugangs, der sektorübergreifenden Herangehensweise und Partizipation der Bevölkerung prägend für die Primärversorgung ist. Der Pflege kommt in diesem System eine zentrale Bedeutung zu, die in dem Beitrag ebenso ausgeführt wird wie Fragen der Qualifizierung. Den Abschluss bilden Überlegungen, welche Lehren sich aus den brasilianischen Erfahrungen für anstehende Diskussionen zur Rolle der Pflege in der Primärversorgung in Deutschland ziehen lassen.
Objectives: to identify the errors in daily intensive nursing care and analyze them according to the theory of human error. Method: quantitative, descriptive and exploratory study, undertaken at the Intensive Care Center of a hospital in the Brazilian Sentinel Hospital Network. The participants were 36 professionals from the nursing team. The data were collected through semistructured interviews, observation and lexical analysis in the software ALCESTE®. Results: human error in nursing care can be related to the approach of the system, through active faults and latent conditions. The active faults are represented by the errors in medication administration and not raising the bedside rails. The latent conditions can be related to the communication difficulties in the multiprofessional team, lack of standards and institutional routines and absence of material resources. Conclusion: the errors identified interfere in nursing care and the clients’ recovery and can cause damage. Nevertheless, they are treated as common events inherent in daily practice. The need to acknowledge these events is emphasized, stimulating the safety culture at the institution.
Objective: to understand the meaning of the Adult Intensive Care Unit environment of care,
experienced by professionals working in this unit, managers, patients, families and professional
support services, as well as build a theoretical model about the Adult Intensive Care Unit
environment of care. Method: Grounded Theory, both for the collection and for data analysis.
Based on theoretical sampling, we carried out 39 in-depth interviews semi-structured from
three different Adult Intensive Care Units. Results: built up the so-called substantive theory
“Sustaining life in the complex environment of care in the Intensive Care Unit”. It was bounded
by eight categories: “caring and continuously monitoring the patient” and “using appropriate
and differentiated technology” (causal conditions); “Providing a suitable environment” and
“having relatives with concern” (context); “Mediating facilities and difficulties” (intervenienting
conditions); “Organizing the environment and managing the dynamics of the unit” (strategy)
and “finding it difficult to accept and deal with death” (consequences). Conclusion: confirmed
the thesis that “the care environment in the Intensive Care Unit is a living environment, dynamic
and complex that sustains the life of her hospitalized patients”.
Dekubitusprophylaxe. Die Rechtsprechung empfiehlt bei dekubitusgefährdeten Patienten ein Lagerungs- und Bewegungsprotokoll mit Einzelleistungsnachweis zu führen. Der Expertenstandard hingegen rät explizit nicht zu einer standardisierten Planung eines längerfristigen Lagerungsintervalls. Dieses Spannungsfeld sorgt für Unsicherheit speziell im Hinblick auf das neue Strukturmodell zur Entbürokratisierung der Pflegedokumentation.