Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (1396)
- Part of a Book (575)
- Book (389)
- Conference Proceeding (384)
- Moving Images (173)
- Other (161)
- Bachelor Thesis (64)
- Report (39)
- Working Paper (39)
- Part of Periodical (38)
- Sound (33)
- Master's Thesis (25)
- Doctoral Thesis (13)
- Course Material (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Study Thesis (1)
Language
- German (2664)
- English (657)
- Portuguese (7)
- Spanish (2)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Dutch (1)
Keywords
- Nachhaltigkeit (16)
- Kommunikation (9)
- Digitalisierung (8)
- Landschaftsarchitektur (7)
- Logistik (7)
- Building Information Modeling (6)
- Physiotherapie (6)
- Solarthermie (6)
- physiotherapy (6)
- Pflege (5)
Institute
- Fakultät WiSo (2129)
- Fakultät AuL (488)
- Institut für Kommunikationsmanagement (198)
- Institut für Management und Technik (155)
- Institut für Duale Studiengänge (150)
- Fakultät IuI (79)
- Institut für Theaterpädagogik (50)
- Fakultät MKT (39)
- Präsidium Hochschule Osnabrück (27)
- Institut für Musik (9)
- LearningCenter (6)
- Sonstige Einrichtungen (6)
Zum WerkAls vielfältig aktiver Jurist hat Dirk Güllemann, Professor für Wirtschaftsrecht an der Hochschule Osnabrück, das Zivilrecht nicht nur weit überblickt, sondern die einzelnen Gebiete bis in die Details durchdrungen und beherrscht.Die 13 Beiträge dieser Festschrift spiegeln nicht nur die Bandbreite der Fachgebiete des Jubilars wider, sondern zeigen auch, wie stark sich das juristische Profil der Hochschule Osnabrück in den letzten Jahrzehnten entwickelt hat.
Developing organizations
(2021)
This chapter reviews organizational development (OD) as networked man-agerial practices and investigates the role these practices play in contemporary strategic management and in management communication. Our analytical overview of studies finds that the literature lacks empirical evidence on the linguistic properties of OD’s practices as these properties have not been researched in OD but in settings where change is solely approached as a planned process. To fill this gap, we propose a research framework to inquire into OD’s verbal, paraverbal, and nonverbal practices. After a tour d’horizon of OD’s and change management’s ontological and epistemological paradigms, we outline the implications of the practice perspective of OD for strategic management, then narrow our focus to empirical studies’ prominent out-comes on discursive practices in change processes, and conclude with a framework for future research
In der Corona-Pandemie ist es für nahezu alle Organisationen – von der Behörde, über die Unternehmung, bis hin zur Hochschule – zur Aufgabe geworden, den „richtigen“ Umgang mit der Krise zu finden. Was effektives Krisenmanagement ausmacht, soll deshalb vor dem Hintergrund des aktuellen Standes der Fachdiskussion beleuchtet und für eine Selbstreflexion aufbereitet werden, wie sie im Rahmen eines dualen Studiengangs eingeübt und im Sinne einer persönlichen Kompetenzentwicklung vertieft werden kann.
Hintergrund: In Deutschland gibt es in der physiotherapeutischen Praxis bisher lediglich 2 Fragebögen, die ellenbogenspezifische Beschwerden aus
der Patientenperspektive erfassen und einen therapeutischen Erfolg messen.
Ziel: Das Ziel dieser Studie war daher die Übersetzung des englischen „Oxford Elbow Score“ (OES)
ins Deutsche.
Methode: Der OES wurde anhand von 2 Leitlinien
zur kulturellen Adaption ins Deutsche übersetzt.
Es wurden 2 unabhängige Vorwärtsübersetzungen
erstellt und miteinander verglichen. Anschließend
erfolgten 2 unabhängige Rückwärtsübersetzungen,
gefolgt von einem Review. Der daraus resultierende
Fragebogen wurde in 2 Testphasen mit jeweils 5
Probanden qualitativ auf seine Verständlichkeit
und kulturelle Stimmigkeit überprüft.
Ergebnisse: Der OES wurde in die deutsche Version
der „Oxford Ellenbogen Bewertung“ (OEB) übersetzt und adaptiert. Nach der 1. Pilotphase wurden
kleinere Änderungen am Fragebogen vorgenommen. Die Überprüfung in der 2. Testphase machte
weitere Änderungen überflüssig.
Schlussfolgerung: Eine autorisierte Version des OES
konnte erfolgreich ins Deutsche übersetzt werden.
Deren Gütekriterien werden in einer nachfolgenden Studie untersucht.
Background: Lumbar discectomy is considered a safe, efficacious and cost-effective treatment for selected cases of patients with leg pain associated with the presence of a disc protrusion. But despite technically successful surgery, 30 % of patients complain of persistent pain on long-term follow up. Identification of possible predictors for a negative outcome is important, in the search for appropriate pre- and/or post-operative care and prevention of persistent disability. There is some evidence in the literature that quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures may play a role in prediction of patients’ pain persistency, however, this has never been investigated in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive value of QST parameters, in combination with previously documented predictor variables such as medical/psychological/cognitive behavioural factors, in patients with lumbar radiculopathy and/or radicular pain, for predicting patients’ clinical outcome after lumbar discectomy.
Method: Participants with radiculopathy and/or radicular pain and confirmed imaging diagnosis of nerve root compression will be recruited from the elective surgery waitlist at one hospital. All participants will undergo lumbar discectomy performed by one neurosurgeon. A standardized QST protocol comprising all of the somatosensory sub-modalities that are mediated by different primary afferents (C-, Aδ-, Aβ-) will be performed prior to surgery. QST will be conducted in the patients’ main pain area and contralateral side, in the affected dermatome and at a remote control site. The presence of other predictor variables will be captured by questionnaires. Follow-up at 3 months will include QST and measurements of pain intensity, pain descriptors, functional status, health related quality of life, return to work and health care utilisation. A further 1-year follow-up will include the same measurements except QST.
Results/Conclusions: Identification of new predictor variables may assist in the development of pre-surgical screening methods and in targeted pre- and/or post-operative patient care, with the potential to improve patients’ functional status, quality of life, work capacity whilst also reducing health care costs associated with persistent disability
Objectives
The aims of the present study were to provide back pain (BP) point prevalence data from inpatients at an Australian tertiary hospital on one day, and compare this with Australian non-hospitalized population prevalence data; to collect data around the development of BP throughout hospital admission; and to analyse the association between BP and past history of BP, gender, age, admission specialty and hospital length of stay (LOS).
Methods
This was a single-site, prospective, observational study of hospitalized inpatients on one day during 2016, with a subsequent survey over the following 11 days (unless discharge or death occurred sooner).
Results
Data were collected from 343 patients (75% of the hospitalized cohort). A third of patients (n = 108) reported BP on admission, and almost a fifth (n = 63) developed new BP during their hospitalization. Patients who described BP at any time during their hospital stay had a higher chance of having had a history of BP, with odds increasing after adjustment for age and gender (odds ratio 5.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0 to 11.6; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and gender, those experiencing BP had a significantly longer LOS (median 13 days; CI 10.8 to 15.3) than those who did not (median 10 days; CI 8.4 to 11.6; p = 0.034).
Conclusions
Hospital LOS for patients who complained of BP at any time during their admission was 3 days longer than those who had no BP, and a history of BP predicted a higher likelihood of BP during admission. Screening of patients on admission to identify any history of BP, and application of a package of care including early mobilization and analgesia may prevent the onset of BP and reduce LOS.
Characterisation of pain in people with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy
(2017)
Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) has historically been considered a pain-free condition, though some people with HNPP also complain of pain. This study characterised persistent pain in people with HNPP. Participants provided cross-sectional demographic data, information on the presence of neurological and persistent pain symptoms, and the degree to which these interfered with daily life. The painDETECT and Central Sensitization Inventory questionnaires were used to indicate potential neuropathic, central sensitisation and musculoskeletal (nociceptive) pain mechanisms. Additionally, participants were asked if they thought that pain was related to/part of HNPP. 32/43 (74%) subjects with HNPP had persistent pain and experience this pain in the last week. Of those with pain, 24 (75%) were likely to have neuropathic pain and 27 (84%) were likely to have central sensitisation. All 32 participants felt that their pain could be related to/part of their HNPP. Significant negative impact of the pain was common. Pain characterisation identified neuropathic pain and/or central sensitisation as common, potential underlying processes. Pain may plausibly be directly related to the underlying pathophysiology of HNPP. Further consideration of including pain as a primary symptom of HNPP is warranted.
Entrapment neuropathies are the most prevalent type of peripheral neuropathy and often a challenge to diagnose and treat. To a large extent, our current knowledge is based on empirical concepts and early (often biomechanical) studies. This Viewpoint will challenge some of the current beliefs with recent advances in both basic and clinical neurosciences.