Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Article (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Keywords
- Animal welfare (2)
- Animal health (1)
- Expert interviews (1)
- German dairy farming (1)
- German dairy sector (1)
- Key indicators (1)
- National monitoring system (1)
- Natural living strategies (1)
- Self-assessment (1)
- Stroh (1)
Institute
- Fakultät AuL (3)
- Fakultät MKT (1)
Dairy farming has been the subject of public debate on animal welfare for a number of years now. Animal welfare discussions on dairy farming often include the demand for more nature connectedness in this area. This study focuses on the divergent perspectives of consumers and scientists on the importance of more nature connectedness for animal welfare strategies in German dairy farming. Within Europe, Germany is the main producer of cow’s milk and an important industry in many rural areas in Germany is dairy farming. The insights presented are based on qualitative interviews with dairy farming and livestock researchers from Germany and Austria. A key finding of this study is that we need to look more closely at the actual content of nature claims in animal welfare debates. The scientists interviewed tend to see idealized conditions in animal welfare discussions with images of nature which in fact seldom lead to improved conditions in dairy farming and, even then, only to a limited extent. The scientists interviewed rate calls for more nature connectedness in dairy farming from the nonagricultural public as anti-modern, complexity-reducing, and normative. Nevertheless, some of the scientists interviewed did have valuable insights into the nonagricultural public’s criticism of dairy farming practices. These scientists argued, however, that animal welfare needs to differentiate between nature connectedness and the innate needs of cattle when it comes to animal welfare strategies. An important conclusion of the study is that more discussion formats are needed to promote the exchange of ideas between different social groups attempting to understand animal welfare in dairy farming.
German farmers are required by law to regularly self-assess the welfare of their animals. The project Q Check is aiming at developing a system that will assist farmers to objectively assess animal health and welfare in dairy cows. For this reason, a quarterly report will be compiled from animal-based key indicators to give an overview of the on-farm situation. The anonymised and aggregated reports can also be used for national animal welfare monitoring: Continuous collection of these key indicators enables the summary and publication of figures reflecting the current animal health and welfare status and progressions at federal state and at national level. Q Check is based on four data recording and analysis systems, which are already established in Germany and implemented on a national level. Out of these systems, the most suitable indicators to describe herd health have been selected by 215 experts within a twostage Delphi study. In addition, over 50 face-to-face interviews with stakeholders related to the German dairy sector have been performed in order to take into account the socio-scientific point of view. To complete the process, the selected indicators are currently being checked against mass data and hence tested for suitability regarding monitoring purposes. An automatic farm-specific evaluation of animal health, based on verified indicators, will provide support to farmers in fulfilling their legal requirements and in identifying weak points on the individual farms. A benchmarking system will be set up which will allow tracking the individual herd health indicators in the same farm in their course over time and compared with similar farms. These routinely provided horizontal and vertical statistics will facilitate targeted intervention and support objectified management decisions, implying that dairy farmers can benefit in several respects. In the course of the project, new tools for determining the risk of ketosis in the scope of milk recording will also be validated and implemented at national level to enhance monitoring of this major disease complex. The results of these nationwide, systematic investigations will contribute substantially to objectifying the discussion about the health and welfare situation of dairy cows.
Animal husbandry methods also play an important role in public discussion, as animal welfare is often valued in society by visual perceptions. In this context, there is often an idealized idea of livestock husbandry and nutrition, which is staged by ideal-typical images. In the minds of many citizens, nature-loving images trigger a positive imagination that results from the longings of urban living conditions. Media and stakeholder analyses indicate that the use of straw in livestock husbandry and nutrition also has a positive impact on the welfare of livestock. According to this, straw is preferred by the public for more animal welfare. But what is not considered is the fact that the straw must be of impeccable hygienic quality
Die Klimakrise und die damit einhergehende notwendige Transformation unseres Energiesystems sind zentrale Themen in Wissenschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft. Neben den technischen und wirtschaftlichen Herausforderungen erfordert die Energiewende einen gesellschaftlichen Veränderungsprozess und muss von Vielen getragen werden. Doch auch wenn Klimaschutz in Deutschland eine hohe Zustimmung erfährt, stößt die konkrete Realisierung von Maßnahmen - wie z.B. der Ausbau der Windenergie - oft auf Widerstand.
Das Projekt „Zukunftsdiskurse in der Umweltkommunikation“ wollte deshalb durch zielgruppengerechte Workshops einen positiven Beitrag zur Energiewende leisten und das Wissen und die Akzeptanz ausbauen.
Folgende Forschungsfrage wurde in diesem Projekt behandelt: „Welche Standpunkte haben die verschiedenen Stakeholder und welche Meinungen und Blickwinkel haben betroffene Anlieger und Energienutzer gegenüber einer Umsetzung für eine Zukunft von 100 % Erneuerbaren Energien?“