Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (126) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (126) (remove)
Keywords
- Digitale Transformation (2)
- Digitalisierung (2)
- dentale Okklusion (2)
- nachhaltige Entwicklung (2)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Alexithymie (1)
- Ammonium/Nitrat-Verhältnis (1)
- Ammoniumtoxizität (1)
- Angle-Klassifikation (1)
- Arbeit 4.0 (1)
Institute
While the importance of supervisors’ communication for the successful implementation of organisational change is often emphasised, evidence regarding the actual dimensions of change communication and the reaction of change recipients is scarce. As communication is highly context and culture specific, this study included participants from Germany and India. To meet these research aims, we conducted focus group discussions (FGD) with overall 50 graduate students with work experiences from Germany and India. We identified key dimensions of informative, empathic and participatory change communication that are of high importance for change recipients. The German and Indian participants had similar expectations regarding the informative and empathic dimensions of change communication. However, interestingly, their assessment of the actual participation differed substantially, with consequences for their emotional responses. The findings emphasise the crucial role of supervisors’ communication for employees’ emotions in times of change. Supervisors thereby need to consider the diverse dimensions of their communication and stimulate employees’ expectations regarding information, empathy and participation with different communicative activities and approaches. This study provides important insights into organisational change communication by analysing its key dimensions, linking it to employees’ emotions and considering the cultural context.
Der Kunde als Dienstleister: Akzeptanz und Gebrauchstauglichkeit von Smart Glasses im Self-Service
(2017)
Forschungsfrage: In welchem Umfang werden Persönlichkeitseigenschaften in Stellenanzeigen verwendet, die eher als maskulin wahrgenommen werden?
Methodik: Wir nutzen einen Pool von deutschsprachigen Stellenanzeigen von Dax-30-Unternehmen, mittelständischen Unternehmen und des öffentlichen Sektors in den Bereichen Personalwesen (N=2.086) und Softwareentwicklung (N=1.811).
Praktische Implikationen: Unternehmen, die eine diverse Belegschaft anstreben, sollten nicht einseitig vor allem maskuline Persönlichkeitseigenschaften fordern. Die Eigenschaften signalisieren auch die Unternehmenskultur.
Für die Versorgungsforschung ist wichtig, dass verteilte und heterogene Daten so integriert werden, dass sie offen für neue Analyse-Anforderungen und leicht um neue Datenquellen erweiterbar sind. Für die Integration von Versorgungsdaten werden bislang hauptsächlich Data-Warehouses eingesetzt, die Daten dimensional oder als Entity-Attribute-Value-Struktur (EAV) modellieren. Diese Datenmodelle sind jedoch entweder unflexibel oder weisen ein zu geringes Maß an Datenorganisation auf, was longitudinale Analysen erschwert. Wir haben den EAV-Ansatz um die Data-Vault-Modellierung ergänzt und damit die Datenstrukturen der Krankenhaus-Qualitätsberichte des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses (G-BA) modelliert sowie die Daten der Jahre 2011 bis 2015 integriert. Dies ermöglicht eine Historisierung der Metadaten für Merkmale, insbesondere der Qualitätsindikatoren, sowie ein hohes Maß an Erweiterbarkeit gegenüber neuen heterogenen Datenquellen. Der vorgeschlagene Ansatz erlaubt es, den Abstraktionsgrad für die zu modellierenden Entitäten frei zu wählen, so dass auch ein vollständig generisches EAV-Modell mit historisierten Metadaten erstellt werden kann.
Background: For more than 30 years, there has been close cooperation between Japanese and German scientists with regard to information systems in health care. Collaboration has been formalized by an agreement between the respective scientific associations. Following this agreement, two joint workshops took place to explore the similarities and differences of electronic health record systems (EHRS) against the background of the two national healthcare systems that share many commonalities.
Objectives: To establish a framework and requirements for the quality of EHRS that may also serve as a basis for comparing different EHRS.
Methods: Donabedian's three dimensions of quality of medical care were adapted to the outcome, process, and structural quality of EHRS and their management. These quality dimensions were proposed before the first workshop of EHRS experts and enriched during the discussions.
Results: The Quality Requirements Framework of EHRS (QRF-EHRS) was defined and complemented by requirements for high quality EHRS. The framework integrates three quality dimensions (outcome, process, and structural quality), three layers of information systems (processes and data, applications, and physical tools) and three dimensions of information management (strategic, tactical, and operational information management).
Conclusions: Describing and comparing the quality of EHRS is in fact a multidimensional problem as given by the QRF-EHRS framework. This framework will be utilized to compare Japanese and German EHRS, notably those that were presented at the second workshop.
Multinational health IT benchmarks foster cross-country learning and have been employed at various levels, e.g. OECD and Nordic countries. A bi-national benchmark study conducted in 2007 revealed a significantly higher adoption of health IT in Austria compared to Germany, two countries with comparable healthcare systems. We now investigated whether these differences still persisted. We further studied whether these differences were associated with hospital intrinsic factors, i.e. the innovative power of the organisation and hospital demographics. We thus performed a survey to measure the “perceived IT availability” and the “innovative power of the hospital” of 464 German and 70 Austrian hospitals. The survey was based on a questionnaire with 52 items and was given to the directors of nursing in 2013/2014. Our findings confirmed a significantly greater IT availability in Austria than in Germany. This was visible in the aggregated IT adoption composite score “IT function” as well as in the IT adoption for the individual functions “nursing documentation” (OR = 5.98), “intensive care unit (ICU) documentation” (OR = 2.49), “medication administration documentation” (OR = 2.48), “electronic archive” (OR = 2.27) and “medication” (OR = 2.16). “Innovative power” was the strongest factor to explain the variance of the composite score “IT function”. It was effective in hospitals of both countries but significantly more effective in Austria than in Germany. “Hospital size” and “hospital system affiliation” were also significantly associated with the composite score “IT function”, but they did not differ between the countries. These findings can be partly associated with the national characteristics. Indicators point to a more favourable financial situation in Austrian hospitals; we thus argue that Austrian hospitals may possess a larger degree of financial freedom to be innovative and to act accordingly. This study is the first to empirically demonstrate the effect of “innovative power” in hospitals on health IT adoption in a bi-national health IT benchmark. We recommend directly including the financial situation into future regression models. On a political level, measures to stimulate the “innovative power” of hospitals should be considered to increase the digitalisation of healthcare.
Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning.
Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined functionality-based measures for availability and use of electronic health records, health information exchange, personal health records, and telehealth. In this pilot, an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group compiled results for 38 countries for a subset of measures with broad coverage using new and/or adapted country-specific or multinational surveys and other sources from 2012 to 2015. We also synthesized country learnings to inform future benchmarking.
Results: While electronic records are widely used to store and manage patient information at the point of care—all but 2 pilot countries reported use by at least half of primary care physicians; many had rates above 75%—patient information exchange across organizations/settings is less common. Large variations in the availability and use of telehealth and personal health records also exist.
Discussion: Pilot participation demonstrated interest in cross-national benchmarking. Using the most comparable measures available to date, it showed substantial diversity in health ICT availability and use in all domains. The project also identified methodological considerations (e.g., structural and health systems issues that can affect measurement) important for future comparisons.
Conclusion: While health policies and priorities differ, many nations aim to increase access, quality, and/or efficiency of care through effective ICT use. By identifying variations and describing key contextual factors, benchmarking offers the potential to facilitate cross-national learning and accelerate the progress of individual countries.